Somehow I just don't think this is over for Rainman. One man's extortion is another man's hush money. If he picked the guy out of a lineup, does that mean he WITNESSED the shooting just moments after he admittedly MET WITH THE SHOOTER who then proceeded to OPEN FIRE on people who had the audacity to TAKE RAINMAN'S $$$ just because he threw it all over the place and at them?
Cops always want the shooter. Will be interesting to hear this guys version of how the events of the evening and exchange of cash went down. I assume he will contend it was traveling/STFU money. Will also be interesting to hear what comes out in the civil cases, or if their are settled.
And as Florio says it will be interesting to hear if the Commissioner was told this version of the story way back when or told something else entirely (RAINMAN saw and knew NOTHING of the shooting or the shooter...).