I realize that the Pats have had great success under those weather conditions, but I, and many others, have always considered bad weather to be "the great equalizer" and I always hate it if they have to play under extreme conditions.
I realize that the Pats have had great success under those weather conditions, but I, and many others, have always considered bad weather to be "the great equalizer" and I always hate it if they have to play under extreme conditions.
For some reason this doesn't apply to the Patriots. Bad weather just isn't an equalizer for the Patriots. IIRC the last game played in really bad condition was the one in Chicago where we beat them badly on their own turf in their weather and their wind.
For some reason this doesn't apply to the Patriots. Bad weather just isn't an equalizer for the Patriots. IIRC the last game played in really bad condition was the one in Chicago where we beat them badly on their own turf in their weather and their wind.
Fond memories of the surprise TD pass just as the half was ending and Da Bayiz were mentally on their way to the warm locker room. That style of play epitomizes the Patriots mentality that made them great.
I appreciate everyone's suggestion that bad weather is "Pats weather" however I still hate it when the weather is bad. I am a firm believer in the "equalizer" theory.
For some reason this doesn't apply to the Patriots. Bad weather just isn't an equalizer for the Patriots. IIRC the last game played in really bad condition was the one in Chicago where we beat them badly on their own turf in their weather and their wind.
(A) In their last three snow games ('08 ARI, '09 TEN, '10 @CHI), the Pats have outscored opponents 109-0 in the first half.
(B) Under BB, at least, the Patriots have never lost a snow game.
I appreciate everyone's suggestion that bad weather is "Pats weather" however I still hate it when the weather is bad. I am a firm believer in the "equalizer" theory.