- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 43,942
- Reaction score
- 22,010
DRAFT NEEDS - FOCUSING ON THE OUR PICKS THROUGH 124 (seven picks now)
We always can use upgrades at almost any position.
QB - 0 We could use a veteran free agent upgrade.
WR - 0 We are more than all set. We gain have Aiken and Slater as backups.
TE - 0 If someone wants to boot Thomas, there are two replacments already on the roster.
RB - 1 I suppose we could use a returner or fullback to replace Green-Ellis.
OG - 4 We should develop one replacement for Mankins or Neal in 2010.
OT - 3 I must say that I am much more satisfied with Light-Kaczur-LeVoir than most.
However, Kaczur insurance is in order. I have low expectations from O'Callaghan.
Dante may be fine with O'Callaghan as a future starter, but his contract ends also.
BOTTOM LINE
If we get a 2nd round guard and a 3rd or 4th round tackle, I will be satisfied. The alternative of an early tackle and a later OG is OK, but less appealing. I really like Unger, Mack and Wood.
We always can use upgrades at almost any position.
QB - 0 We could use a veteran free agent upgrade.
WR - 0 We are more than all set. We gain have Aiken and Slater as backups.
TE - 0 If someone wants to boot Thomas, there are two replacments already on the roster.
RB - 1 I suppose we could use a returner or fullback to replace Green-Ellis.
OG - 4 We should develop one replacement for Mankins or Neal in 2010.
OT - 3 I must say that I am much more satisfied with Light-Kaczur-LeVoir than most.
However, Kaczur insurance is in order. I have low expectations from O'Callaghan.
Dante may be fine with O'Callaghan as a future starter, but his contract ends also.
BOTTOM LINE
If we get a 2nd round guard and a 3rd or 4th round tackle, I will be satisfied. The alternative of an early tackle and a later OG is OK, but less appealing. I really like Unger, Mack and Wood.
