carolinatony
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2006
- Messages
- 2,844
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I don't know about the Plaxeco's catch though. It did not look out of bounds to me based on the fact that they called it a catch. Was there enough evidence to out turn there? I doubt we get that decision on an away ground.
I don't know about the Plaxeco's catch though. It did not look out of bounds to me based on the fact that they called it a catch. Was there enough evidence to out turn there? I doubt we get that decision on an away ground.
I don't know about the Plaxeco's catch though. It did not look out of bounds to me based on the fact that they called it a catch. Was there enough evidence to out turn there? I doubt we get that decision on an away ground.
Let's not forget Ghostowski either 3/3 on his kicks. If he misses any of those the Jets have a solid shot to win on the last drive.
It was a good call his foot was touching the line. I actually thought it was fairly obvious, and wondered if i could see it on tv without slowmo how come the two officials couldn't. They were looking right at it.I don't know about the Plaxeco's catch though. It did not look out of bounds to me based on the fact that they called it a catch. Was there enough evidence to out turn there? I doubt we get that decision on an away ground.
uhhhh; foot on white sideline mean anything to you?
I don't know about the Plaxeco's catch though. It did not look out of bounds to me based on the fact that they called it a catch. Was there enough evidence to out turn there? I doubt we get that decision on an away ground.
I did not see a foot on the line. I did see a Pats players foot on the line conclusively.
I may need to see it again, but of the three angles I saw, it was at best inconclusive to me.
BTW, I am happy if it is not obvious, just saying that on an away ground with pressure on the refs, they don't overturn that call. After all, this is a same guy who said V Cruz did not fumble last week.
I did not see a foot on the line. I did see a Pats players foot on the line conclusively.
I may need to see it again, but of the three angles I saw, it was at best inconclusive to me.
BTW, I am happy if it is not obvious, just saying that on an away ground with pressure on the refs, they don't overturn that call. After all, this is a same guy who said V Cruz did not fumble last week.