Does this look accurate to you guys?

[glm]

I subtracted the Bendability (Cold, Hard Football Facts.com: 2010 Bendability Index) and and the Scoreability (Cold, Hard Football Facts.com: 2010 Scoreability Index)

from each Pats team since 01 to see which team was potentially the best.



And here's the list:



9. 05 Pats (.787)

8. 08 Pats (1.739)

7. 09 Pats (2.093)

6. 02 Pats (2.194)

5. 03 Pats (4.483)

4. 06 Pats (5.518)

3. 07 Pats (5.766)

2. 01 Pats (6.402)

1. 04 Pats (6.474)

 

[pheenix11]

Subtracted them from what, PI? This list is horrible.

 

[Tunescribe]

Subtracted them from what, PI? This list is horrible.

That "Brady Bunch" sig is horrible as well.

 

[glm]

Subtracted them from what, PI? This list is horrible.

As I already stated in my original post, subtracted Bendability from Scorability. To make it more easy to understand: Bendability-Scoreabilty.

And no need to act like I said that this list as the truth or someother BS. I asked for the general consesus of the list.

 

[sbpatfan]

Good lord, are people really making up stats now like "bendability" of an NFL offense? Save that kind of crap for material engineers.

 

[pheenix11]

As I already stated in my original post, subtracted Bendability from Scorability. To make it more easy to understand: Bendability-Scoreabilty.

And no need to act like I said that this list as the truth or someother BS. I asked for the general consesus of the list.

Sorry, I see what you did now, I also didn't notice you counted down.

Yes this looks about right and just pisses me off more about 2006.

 

[PatsDeb]

That "Brady Bunch" sig is horrible as well.

I think it's kind of funny, but apparently one of the kids is about to fly the coup.