What if they were overinflated and dropped down into the low end of the acceptable range.Except it doesn't explain why the Colts footballs measured up just fine.
SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
What if they were overinflated and dropped down into the low end of the acceptable range.Except it doesn't explain why the Colts footballs measured up just fine.
Glazer is pretty accurate too.
I could accept it and live with it if the NFL makes a statement such as that. That yes, the Patriots violated a rule, BUT there was no competitive advantage involved in what they did. Go ahead, fine us. Take away a late draft pick if you have to. Just call it good from that standpoint.All this "advantage to grip better in cold & rain" when using under-inflated balls.
Well, IF the Colts already was suspicious in the REGULAR game against the Patriots, how can it be an advantage? It was IN A DOME.
So, I think the "advantage thing" is BS.
My guess is that Brady wanted footballs to be a bit under-inflated. As all QBs have preferences.
Somehow, they may have switched the balls? or something like that.
Bottom line is that they intentionally broken the NFL rule. That is the issue, NOT a competitive advantage baloney.
IMO.
https://twitter.com/nflonfox/status/558042108506820610
Jay Glazer.. Not looking good.. Says some in the league down there are tired of this crap from pats
What an absolute crock of **** he is saying. Teams are mad because the book gets thrown at them but not the Pats? What was the last thing the Pats did that has them in trouble with the league? The camera thing. 7 frigging years ago.
Then he brings up the jests tampering thing. They did it because Woody Johnson tampered. If Belichick or Kraft did what Johnson did they would have gotten in trouble in a second.
Wow, Belichick and the Pats sound done.
I could accept it and live with it if the NFL makes a statement such as that. That yes, the Patriots violated a rule, BUT there was no competitive advantage involved in what they did. Go ahead, fine us. Take away a late draft pick if you have to. Just call it good from that standpoint.
Jay Glazer is full of ****
You against getting screwed? Ahh, you live in momma basement huh?You guys are screwed lol.
Except it doesn't explain why the Colts footballs measured up just fine.
I still find it funny how the only article on NFL.com discussing the deflate-gate is the one about Browner's tweet. Interesting..
Absolutely correct sir. He should have complained when Goodell leaked the confidential tape to Glazer and when the tapes were destroyed without an explanation of what was on the tapes. He has given the POS carte blanche to eviscerate BB and the Pats over nothing again. As I said I hope I am wrong but I have seen both Goodell and Kraft in action before and I have no reason to think there will anything different this time.And what Glazer reports is another reason Kraft shouldn't have played kissyface in 2007 and beyond. It gets him nothing anyways.