Where the hell do you come up with this?
Mills was NOT the first player off the bench. That was actually Myles Bryant. But why let facts get in the way, right?
Hawkins is a former starter for the Falcons. Claiming that he's primarily a special teamer is complete nonsense on your part. Did you bother to do ANY sort of research on what happened to him in Atlanta after starting 16 games in 2022 and
Isaiah Bolden spent time in TC moving back and forth between CB and FS.
Do you realize that Dugger and Peppers BOTH spent time at FS?
There is also no telling what they are going to do with MAPU.
BELIEVE AS YOU WILL
So, Mills didn't start and he wasn't first off the bench but he still played in 40% of the defensive reps, primarily (exclusively) at safety.
So, I said I thought that we need the additional safety.
The response was the 40% was essentially an illusion. After all Myles Brant was the first safety off the bench. Thsi somehow is supposed to make me feel better about losing a backup
I AGREE AND LIKE THAT
1) Duggar and Peppers are our starters, with both playing FS as schemed.
2) Mapu is a linebacker in a dual role, hopefully continuing.
3) Hawkins should be our #3 instead of the #4 (my error).
4) Still we lost our 4th safety. We lost Mills and Phillips. Apparently, we also lost Safety Bryant.
QUESTION
Should we make the change and carry only 3 safeties? Are safeties so unimportant to our Defense that a backup isn't needed? If so, say so.
I may be in the small minority, bit, for me, we start 5 defensive backs and should have 5 backups on the 53, usually labelled as 6 CB's and 4 safeties. [Schooler shouldn't be counted as a safety]. Maybe 3 safeties is right, or 5 corners. What say you all?