At his best clearly Gronk is the answer. When healthy he was the GOAT TE.
However all things considered I need to put him #2 behind Gonzo because longevity matters. I put Winslow #3.
It does but how much?
Could Tony's body handle what was asked of Gronk?
Could Tony still put up those #'s if he was asked to do what Gronk did?
Imo there isnt anything that Tony did better than Gronk.
I'm surprised posters are even comparing the two tbh.
Tony racked up his #'s bc of longevity. He had plenty of seasons w 2TD, 5TD, 6TD & comes in at 11.4 y/r. Only 3 w 10+ TDs.
Gronk had 5 seasons w 10+ TDs. & 15.1 y/r.
Tony played
17 years & had 111 TDs. Gronk has 79 in only 115 games.
Both have 4 1K seasons.
I understand a lot of things come into play here besides the players themselves but in terms of the TE position I can't even think of anyone who's close.
Also being dominate matters in these debates I think. Certainly when it comes to the HOF. Was Tony ever truly dominate? Maybe for stretches.
Sure Gronk had injuries but when he was out there, healthy, he always dominated. There was never a question of whos the baddest dude out there.
Gronk was Megatron. Best offensive player in the game excluding QBs. Again I dont think you could ever say that abt Tony & I think he's a unbelievable player. Easily
one of the greats but not close to 87 imo.