#2 Pick: LJ or Stephen Jackson?

[Real World]

I had my draft Monday night, and I got the #2 pick. I decided on Jackson since he's in a crappier NFC, and shouldn't be the victim of a defense geared to stop him. I think I made the right choice. The thing is, I still can't believe I passed on Larry Johnson! The guy is a manchild and I hope it doesn't come back to bite me. Anyhow, did I do the right thing, or should I have gone with LJ?

 

[Pat_the_Patriot]

SJax... IMHO there is no question on #2.

 

[BelichickFan]

I'd take Jackson too. Anything offensive related to Herm scares me - and he's wrecked the passing game so much it could hurt the run also. Jackson all the way.

 

[chris_in_sunnyvale]

SJax. He's pretty much the unanimous choice in every draft site for the 1.02 pick.

LJ's OL is not the same one from 2 years ago when he steamrolled the league. LJ was ran over 400 times last year. KC's offense in general looks in rough shape and they play in a division with three stout defenses in SD, Denver and Oakland.

You chose wisely.

Regards,
Chris

 

[Stokes]

SJax. He's pretty much the unanimous choice in every draft site for the 1.02 pick.

LJ's OL is not the same one from 2 years ago when he steamrolled the league. LJ was ran over 400 times last year. KC's offense in general looks in rough shape and they play in a division with three stout defenses in SD, Denver and Oakland.

You chose wisely.

Regards,
Chris

I 100% agree. I don't even think I'd draft LJ #3, too many things going against him.

 

[brady199]

KC lost some good O-linemen, and Bennett was hurt last year, which is why L.J. got all thoose carries, he won't get 400 again,

but... it will be interesting to see if Leonard gets any carries at the goalline

 

[nukin]

I would get green bay's defense #2 if I were you.