I still don't understand why they don't add 3 more players to the rosters by designating "3 special teams only" players. The LS, K & P, who can only play on special teams or the team loses a roster spot, which will never happen. That will solve a lot of PS to active roster movements. And the cost for those extra 3 spots would be miniscule.
I still don't understand why they don't add 3 more players to the rosters by designating "3 special teams only" players. The LS, K & P, who can only play on special teams or the team loses a roster spot, which will never happen. That will solve a lot of PS to active roster movements. And the cost for those extra 3 spots would be miniscule.
Too expensive. Most NFL owners eat at local soup kitchens as it is. No way they could afford 3 more special teams players, that would cost them like a million bucks.
I still don't understand why they don't add 3 more players to the rosters by designating "3 special teams only" players. The LS, K & P, who can only play on special teams or the team loses a roster spot, which will never happen. That will solve a lot of PS to active roster movements. And the cost for those extra 3 spots would be miniscule.
With the extra game they now play and the possibility of a 18th, seems to me you'd be helping the NFL better cultivate and train quality depth by expanding the rosters or changing PS rules like you suggest