Search results

You have a deep need for excitement, don't you? What - specifically - would you have had them do differently by way of "shooting for the homerun." (Sorry to mix sports, but don;t most home run hitters strike out a lot?)

I'm a lifelong wordmonger, but "prunty" threw me for a loop. I looked it up: The name Prunty is of Irish origin, derived from the Gaelic "Ó Prontaigh," meaning "descendant of Pronta," which is thought to mean "ready" or "prompt." It can also be interpreted as "bestower of generosity" from the...

I gave it a B. When your picks are this late in each round, you have to temper your expectations. The result was a B (Even as I type that I think A- sounds better) in large part because of where we drafted. B at that draft position is about as good as it can get. On the other hand, we did fill...

Defensible, but less of a sure thing than you expect in a first rounder, even when your pick is at the tail end of it. I don't follow college football at all: just too corrupt and corrupting for my perhaps overprecious sensibilities, so I can't be sure, but I find it hard to believe that there...

Agree absolutely. This is a painful, private matter. The purveyors of schlock and titillating drivel in the press and the fools who lap it up like middle school bullies should be ashamed of themselves. Vrabel should have issued a suitably bowdlerized (I suppose) version of "go **** yourselves"...

No, it is not. If I am wrong, then the rot of our collective consciousness - and conscience - by continual exposure to childish clickbait, with resulting addiction to asinine, adolescent melodrama, pantytwisting sanctimoniousness. celebrity dreck, and soft-porn titillation has gone even deeper...

Ooooo. It all just sound so titillating when you on about it. Enjoy. How you must miss the old Jerry Springer show.

Adults don't care and regard it as none of their business in any, or perhaps those who don't share your need to dwell on the matter are simply more healthy-minded.

If this is made necessary by his marital situation or in support of his own emotional well-being, he is in my judgement doing just the right thing. To the extent it is necessitated by the self-indulgence of sanctimonious, gossiping fan boys or by the pandering of clickbait-mongering...

You indicated that she cannot sue because in your view there is no basis for such a suit. You are entitled to your opinion - I have no way of evaluating the worth of your opinion, nor do I care to acquaint myself with your qualifications, since I certainly see no reason to value your...

Since when have lawyers been motivated by reasonableness or morality? Something new? In today's news: "The driver who struck and killed a Nebraska jogger is suing the dead man's estate after the accident allegedly left him with severe post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), court documents say."

Get back to picking games. When it comes to moral reflection, you're out of your depth. Find something else to twist those panties over.

This whole thing is rumor-mongering horseshit in my view. I wish he had just told the press and all the fanboys with their salacious gossip and pontification to go **** themselves. As for Russini, I've never been a fan, but I hope she sues her ex-employers and walks away with a bundle.

This obsession with receivers is baffling. The WR is at this point far from the team's worst problem. We are distorting our perception of the team's needs and thus of its approach to the off-season with this silly grasping at shiny objects. A "proven" WR is an old receiver - it takes time to...

I understand: they made it to the SB last year, which makes my view that they still have very significant remaining work to do in the rebuild sound pretty fishy. I just can't shake the idea that last year's success was not a legit reflection of the team's quality. I know I can't point to any...

Yep. For a year, maybe. I'd rather have the cheaper option, with upside potential, we'd get if we keep the draft pick. Draft and develop is the way to go, unless a team has perhaps a single glaring need but is solid across the board otherwise. We are not in that position. This roster is thin in...

I'd do that, but giving especially a 2028 first OR second round pick for him would be absolutely stupid. He's a gimpy old WR with maybe a year of use left in him. All the enthusiasm for the guy is just silly.

Again, it it depends on the fith between what we need and what is available. If the swap would improv thteam, do it, but we don't know as we speak who will be available.

I don't see that this observation is at all in conflict with my point.

Depends on who you are looking to acquire at that point.