Search results

Pro day numbers, yes? I watched him and he doesn't look draftable. Good UDFA special teams option, plays hard, good attitude, but doesn't look dynamic in the games I saw.

I like his skillset. But no thanks.

Wow, that makes me question my eyes, because that's exactly the opposite of how I view them. Maybe I need to give them both another rewatch when I get the time.

I think it's GPS data, or at least I've seen similar ones that track movement.

I've always thought running backs have to be SPECIAL to go top half of round one (bottom half is different, because the 5th year on the rookie contract is reasonable for a good player). Jeanty's movements through drills is stunning. Absolutely perfect body control, lean, shifts in momentum...

Not to brag, but yeah, I kinda am. ;)

I like other prospects better than Tet, but I'll actually defend him here. I've worked jobs that I didn't like but I still dedicated myself to become excellent because I want to be a responsible member of the workforce. The NFL is a job in the entertainment industry at the end of the day, not...

2023 is the year I'd recommend watching. He ran more traditional routes then and showed off his ability to separate in small spaces. For some reason he was largely relegated to gadget player in 2024.

Definitely a difference in production, and Lane is undersized, as well. When I watch his routes and movement on the field, though, I see a more nuanced player who creates separation earlier in his routes (to be fair, Noel is often running more vertical routes). The two aren't running the same...

I actually prefer Lane to Noel. :)

Imagine him at a svelte 400 even. Some real potential as a run stuffer if he can stay on the field.

Plenty of us liked the way he looked before he ran the 40 because he has smooth routes and can get open against man coverage. While I tend to prefer seeing production, putting up stats doesn't guarantee future performance, either. It's all a projection game, and there are so many non-metric...

The best info I can find says 6027 for Harry. That's 7/8 not 3/8. But it's a pretty minor difference, and I'll give you the height argument. :) Where I disagree is that he was double covered. I've watched pretty much every target he's had over the last couple years and he put up most of his...

Sign me up for Robinson!

1 inch and 1/4. It's not that big a difference. And I posted the wingspan measurements above; you can verify them or not, but Harry had more reach. Regardless, I don't think Tet is the right choice unless we also have plans to bring in an actual outside receiver. I do like Tet though as an...

No one knows because he didn't test other than a single hand-timed 40.

Is it fair to look at the matchup when he was a freshman? Maybe not. But being a rookie in the NFL isn't that much different when you look at the jump in competition. Gonzo was not even remotely challenged. Tet will probably be productive in the NFL as a big slot who's pretty good at getting...

Tet is a good receiver. My problem isn't his testing or speed. It's his ability to play the X. He's more of a power slot (and very very good there) than a true outside receiver who can win against press. Could he develop into that? Absolutely. But I don't see him doing it that much on tape. He's...

His RAS would be even higher if he were larger. In terms of testing results, this is one of the best profiles I've ever seen. Ever. Only the mediocre height and below average weight prevent him from achieving a top 10 all-time score. Routes are quick and fluid enough to earn early playing time...

Welcome back! Gone for years and still able to incisively sum up our entire draft forum discussion over the last season. That's talent. You were missed. :)