Search results

But where is the 07 Giants team in this postseason? There are no Strahan, Tuck, Umenyora, Alford, or Pierce's on one team together. Closets would be maybe the Rams. But their back end is worse then the 07 Giants back end was. Chiefs remind me of the 2013 Broncos on offense. But again, there is...

You are comparing apples to oranges. Finals is a best of 7 series. Meaning, Jordan's Bulls could have an off game or two, yet still win it all. Whereas in Football, we've seen the inferior team (01 Pats, 07 Giants) win it all simply because the juggernaut opponent wasn't at their best on that...

Three likely outcomes from this game: Chiefs win a close one. Chiefs win in a blowout. Or Pats win in a close game. When you factor in the HFA & talent on both sides, the Chiefs have more margin for error. I think they can have a few turnovers and penalties, yet still win the game. If the Pats...

I don't want the Rams to win mainly because the ten fans they have don't deserve it. I don't think most of LA even knows they have two football teams. Terrible sports city.

Are "experts" picking against the Pats because they legitimately think they are inferior to the Chiefs? Or are they picking against the Pats because they are tired of them? I ask this because very few (From what I've seen) are able to give an x's & o's reason as to why the Patriots are inferior...

Did he ref the Eagles Saints game? Because Saints fans were livid with whoever the refs were.

At what point could the league postpone a game due to frigid temperatures? Now obviously the freezing cold will hurt the Chiefs more than the Pats. But what about the 80,000 fans?

Yepp. I believe we would've been looking at a 55-10 type massacre. The freezing temperatures hurt two franchises that night.

Freezing temperatures certainly had an affect on both offenses. GB was very explosive that season. Better temperatures likely gets them the win. Which in turn gives the Patriots an easier SB matchup...But I digress..

The 15% is based on the Brady "struggles", per ESPN. Road record is factored into that too. But my thinking is that Past results are not indicative of future results. Brady looks completely healthy now.

You want the best four teams playing in the conference championship games. I believe the four best teams are competing this weekend. No frauds like the Texans, Eagles, or Colts. The four teams that should be here...are here. ESPN has the Saints & Chiefs virtually tied (33 percent each) as the...

If I were a bandwagon jumper wouldn't I have stopped cheering for them between 05-13? After all, they went without a SB in that time.

No. I've only been a Pats fan since I started following football in 04.

Edelman may not even be the greatest Patriots postseason receiver, let alone the greatest playoff receiver ever. A case could be made for Amendola, Branch, & Gronk. Unless Gronk is in a different category because he's a TE.

That's ludicrous. My top five list in order: Brady, Montana, Elway, Marino, & Manning.

Not a wagon jumper. Patriots fan since 04.

I think ****erson was a great RB. But he brings absolutely nothing as an analyst. He's boring. Likely why he got fired from MNF many years ago. And nobody cares what happened in 01. Get with the times.

Can never have enough OL. And I'd rather see Hill/FA next season then Burkehead.

Pretty sure I'm not an Iggles fan.

I'm talking about my preference as a fan. If someone said:"Would you rather your team lose in the title game or SB", I'll take the title game. But that's only if I knew what the result would be (Hindsight etc etc). And media will hold it against Brady if he loses in a SB. They won't appreciate...