Search results

Yup, you looked into he cap implications much more thoroughly than I did. I was admittedly lazy in my analysis, thanks for the deeper dive. The fact that there has been more talk of his potential retirement only strengthens the case for an OT at 31.

Come on Zebra, you know that isn't true ;)

They are not the picks I would make. That said, for a guy picking for all 32 teams, not an area reporter that really knows one team, he did a decent job for the Pats. Again, not the picks I would make and he's not a guy a take too seriously, but if our draft went this way it wouldn't be outlandish.

Actually had 3 ints and 18 passes defended and played all 17 games. Maybe he's actually serviceable now.

Forbes was with someone last year, I remember watching him play... Now I have to google who that team was. Just googled, Rams.

Again, you're making grand generalizations. Vrabel and Wolf want an offense that scores points. They want a tough offense to run when they have to and protect a lead and the QB. That doesn't mean there isn't a place on this team for skilled players who lack violence. Baltimore is a smash mouth...

I haven't read a single article on the Russini situation, what a waste of time. I did see a huge thread discussing it and if Vrabel should be fired. My lord.

Can't imagine any scenario where we exit the 2nd round without an OT or Edge.

Yes Vrabel wants violent players, but you have made several comments discounting players due to lack of violence. It was generalization, you don't discount players based on one statement. Stowers could be a big mismatch and very productive in the NFL, to discount him or anyone else because...

Go to the draft forum, you will get more than your fill of football talk!

And let's be real, BB got lucky to get Gonzo, he almost effed that up too. If he knew he was going to be this good, no way he would've traded back. He did so cause he was comfortable with Forbes or Gonzo, whichever the Skins didn't take. Lucky for us, they took Forbes.

You don't need to add. I won't defend the 1st rd pick, I said as much. Overall it's not a bad draft at all.

I think you're over generalizing a bit. of the top 15 (17 players, 3 tied 10 sacks) sack leaders last year: 10 are 1st rd picks 2 are 2nd rd picks 2 are 3rd rd picks 2 are 4th rd picks 1 is a 6th rd pick Simple math says you're 5x more likely to find a stud pass rusher in the 1st rd than any...

Again, not ideal use of our first, but overall it's not a bad draft at all.

You lost me here. You're saying our front office/coaching staff thinks Ponder is a 1st rd caliber stud? Just because we had a position coach say he's the best UDFA he's worked with? Sorry Wozzy, you're stretching here.

Agreed. I wouldn't want Stowers in the first, but no one would complain if he turned into Kelce. I''m not high on Sadiq. Not sure why, but he gives me bust vibes. In totality tho it's not a bad draft, hits on several needs with some high risk/reward players.

Ya, definitely went a different direction rd 1 and 3. Overall there's some good players there. Not ideal, but if guys like Stowers, Kelly, Heinrich, Cownover and Young work out, it's definitely not a bad draft, it's actually pretty decent.

https://www.nfl.com/news/seven-round-2026-nfl-mock-draft-round-one

I would gladly take that. I would probably take 3 different players with the last 3 picks. I like Gyllenborg, Koziol or Villari over Hibner. Just personal presence, Hibner could be better than those 3.

We will all know soon. I would add RT does seem easier to find later than LT. There are plenty of good NFL RTs drafted after rd 1. I think you run the equal risk of not getting a difference maker at RT or Edge as the rds get deeper. Now I do agree that after Iheancor/Lomu/Miller there seems to...