- Joined
- Jul 3, 2010
- Messages
- 13,332
- Reaction score
- 20,134
I have an engineering degree too. I can do math , but there are not many of us at The Club.I have an Engineering degree, I like to party
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I have an engineering degree too. I can do math , but there are not many of us at The Club.I have an Engineering degree, I like to party
I accept the view of SF. I would also point out to those who have never left New England that SF doesn't play in downtown SF. There are many very happy and wealthy tech community very close to the stadium.This. The rest of his list is solid. I’d add Nashville, Atl (though they actually live and practice up near me in the suburbs an hour from Atlanta), TX, AZ, etc.
Years ago I worked in biotech a lot and SF was a nice spot along with Sunnyvale and Mountainview. Now?
SF is an absolute literal ****hole.
Someone has to count the beers!I have an engineering degree too. I can do math , but there are not many of us at The Club.
If Brown or Pierce is married and have cooking channels on Tik Tok, perhaps they might love New England, but probably not.Posters argue that players do not want to sign in MA because the taxes are too high, and then argue that players want to sign in CA where the taxes are higher.
Lots of players are not looking for Nightlife. D Maye, T Henderson, W Campbell, etc. for example.
D Maye's wife has a cooking channel on Tik Tok. She made chocolate chip cookies for all of the travelers on Jet Blue to the SB - 100s if not 1000s of cookies - I am sure Drake helped some. It is a common misconception that all athletes like nightlife and strip clubs. Alex Pierce graduated with a degree in Mech Engineering. Do you think the nightlife in LA is packed full with engineers? LOL
I don't see it as snarky, just personal preference and a very broad generalization.I accept the view of SF. I would also point out to those who have never left New England that SF doesn't play in downtown SF. There are many very happy and wealthy tech community very close to the stadium.
If I seem a bit snarky, I just don't understand how folks think that Providence and Boston are so much better as a place to live for rich 26-year-olds.
I gave a quick list, and yes Nashville belongs on that list.
There are many others that are likely to be viewed more favorable than Boston/Providence. a very low bar. Almost any city in the South or West would likely be preferable.
Of course, I'm very biased. I did live in CA for 10 years. After living in NE for 35 years, I retired in the South. and am very happy with the choice.
You are right, I am wrong The wealth tax probably would not apply to Pierce.That's a proposed tax on billionaires, so it wouldn't affect 99.999% of athletes even if it becomes law and holds up in court.
You somehow missed the whole point.If Brown or Pierce is married and have cooking channels on Tik Tok, perhaps they might love New England, but probably not.
==========
No engineers in the LA area? ROLF
I agree.I don't see it as snarky, just personal preference and a very broad generalization.
Everyone is different, and some prefer the allures of the big sexy city and some prefer certain weather.
Some don't.
During the season the players don't have a lot of free time to explore, and many live elsewhere in the offseason.
We have no idea what drives Pierce.
Being 26 and rich doesn't automatically make him thirst for the sun of the south.
If you're making 100 million dollars and you're worried about a couple of % in taxes (remember, half your games are on the road), then...well, I just give up.Paying CA taxes is a better choice?
There's no wealth tax in California, and the one proposed would only affect people who have over $1 BILLION...that's a thousand million dollars.Posters have not been to SF recently. They do not understand what SF is now.
5% wealth tax in CA and posters think players are flocking there? A wealth tax is not an income tax, a wealth tax includes 5% of your overall wealth, so if the player has any publicly traded stock and bonds, private business interests, and even art, for example, they lose 5% of that too.
I've been all over this country a lot that last 30 years. Lots of great places out there. But if I was a rich 26-year-old, I'd be in South Bay...just a few miles south of LA. Freaking heaven.I accept the view of SF. I would also point out to those who have never left New England that SF doesn't play in downtown SF. There are many very happy and wealthy tech community very close to the stadium.
If I seem a bit snarky, I just don't understand how folks think that Providence and Boston are so much better as a place to live for rich 26-year-olds.
I gave a quick list, and yes Nashville belongs on that list.
There are many others that are likely to be viewed more favorable than Boston/Providence. a very low bar. Almost any city in the South or West would likely be preferable.
Of course, I'm very biased. I did live in CA for 10 years. After living in NE for 35 years, I retired in the South. and am very happy with the choice.
That is the truth!You are right, I am wrong The wealth tax probably would not apply to Pierce.
My thought is the same though. Posters are concerned about FAs not signing with the Pats due to MA taxes, but think players will ignore the taxes in CA because the players want the endorsements and nightlife. Lots and lots of players never get any endorsements and are not interested in nightlife.
Pierce might prefer the Chargers for his personal reasons. We will see. I am hopeful we sign Pierce. I like hard working, tough players like Pierce.
The point is Brown can line up as an X or a Z and be more of a possession receiver. He more versatile than Pierce. But again, I'm not advocating for Brown over Pierce.But im not sure it’s an added dimension. Forcing a bunch of targets to a guy who will get #1 focus doesn’t seem like a plus to our offense.
I bought my house in MA 11 years ago and its value has gone up 4x.And yeah, no one wants to live out there, which is why I've got a line of people wanting to buy my house out in SoCal for about twice what I paid for it (brand new) just a few years ago.
Agreed.I accept the view of SF. I would also point out to those who have never left New England that SF doesn't play in downtown SF. There are many very happy and wealthy tech community very close to the stadium.
If I seem a bit snarky, I just don't understand how folks think that Providence and Boston are so much better as a place to live for rich 26-year-olds.
I gave a quick list, and yes Nashville belongs on that list.
There are many others that are likely to be viewed more favorable than Boston/Providence. a very low bar. Almost any city in the South or West would likely be preferable.
Of course, I'm very biased. I did live in CA for 10 years. After living in NE for 35 years, I retired in the South. and am very happy with the choice.
McDaniel signing as the OC in LA was a really good move. Not only did Herbert need this badly, but McDaniel is going to attract a guy like Pierce. It's going to be tough to compete is LA pursues Pierce.
He's WR friendly. On the other hand, Josh's system requires mind reading and Jedi mind tricks. In the end, Pierce will make that determination.Disagree, for all the reasons already stated. And why on earth would any offensive player choose Mike MacDaniel over Josh MacDaniels? One has multiple rings and the other is an abject failure with a wet brain,
| 13 | 632 |
| 61 | 9K |
| 20 | 6K |
| 23 | 797 |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 5 - April 20 (Through 26yrs)











