Official Post Game Thread-Pats beat the Cowboys!!!

robertweathers said:

Better protection. Better running . More time to throw

Click to expand...

Soliel said:

I’m glad we beat these bums. I did not want to hear skip and Shannon’s noise tomorrow

Click to expand...

dtbrks said:

Just put biffins on ignore.
my experience here will now be so much better.

Click to expand...

UptownPatsFan said:

Wow

Click to expand...

Ring 6 said:

3rd down was the issue. Too many drives stalled in 3rd down. And too many drops. Overall they ran well, protected Brady ok, had open receivers. Much less to clean up to get it clicking.

Click to expand...

Ring 6 said:

3rd down was the issue. Too many drives stalled in 3rd down. And too many drops. Overall they ran well, protected Brady ok, had open receivers. Much less to clean up to get it clicking.

Click to expand...

PatsBoy12 said:

Bertrand, Bedard are trashing Meyers on 98.5. Yes, he had a few drops, but I thought he played about as well as anyone should have realistically expected. The guy is an undrafted rookie starting against a very good team in terrible weather. What more can you expect?

Click to expand...

sambam94 said:

don't all drives stall on 3rd down?

Click to expand...

condon84 said:

Our OL did a pretty good job pass protecting.

Brady had good time in the pocket in a lot of his dropbacks.

Click to expand...

bormio said:

Ever hear of a block?

Click to expand...

Mack Herron said:

They were 100% confident that the clock would run for their play which was longer than 2 seconds left.

Click to expand...

Ring 6 said:

Because the biggest chance to lose is a blocked fg attempt

Click to expand...

XLIX said:

Way too much risk. BB doesn't care about your point spread.

Click to expand...

ashley1992 said:

I think it's too much of a risk, if it gets blocked or a bad snap and the Cowboys get a td, not worth the risk.

Click to expand...

Angelpats said:

They were hoping to run the time off so there was no chance for another play. Whereas a fg, leads to a possible kickoff return.

Click to expand...

PScottman said:

Wet ball. Wet field. Long snap. That was pure playing the percentages of having something potentially go wrong with few/no defenders to stop it (blocked kick) versus eleven defenders to stop it (another "Miami miracle" scenario) with one second on the clock (given the unforeseeable ineptitude of the timekeeper).

The call was the correct one.

Click to expand...

SlowGettingUp said:

The spread was 6 points, right?

Click to expand...

stcjones said:

Might have been blocked and run back for TD....only reason

Click to expand...

TommyBrady12 said:

Go back to the Miami game last year...the object is to kill the clock in that situation rather than give Dallas the potential for another play

Click to expand...

robertweathers said:

Why risk a block? Why risk a bad snap, scoop, and score?

Click to expand...

robbomango said:

A blocked FG could end up going the other way for a TD...

Click to expand...

PatsBoy12 said:

Bertrand, Bedard are trashing Meyers on 98.5. Yes, he had a few drops, but I thought he played about as well as anyone should have realistically expected. The guy is an undrafted rookie starting against a very good team in terrible weather. What more can you expect?

Click to expand...

Ring 6 said:

Mixed bag. Good job getting open, terrible job catching the football.

Click to expand...

Biffins said:

Why did Pats not kick a FG on the last play they had the ball instead of throwing it out of bounds. FG should have gotten the lead to 7 pts in case of any shenanigans.

Click to expand...

Clonamery said:

Won't be around for that team but younger Patsfans might...

Click to expand...

sambam94 said:

don't all drives stall on 3rd down?

Click to expand...

Deus Irae said:

We can expect him to catch the ball.

Click to expand...

Clonamery said:

Won't be around for that team but younger Patsfans might...

Click to expand...