Recent content by n1997y

exactly. It’s the culture wars. It’s not about trust keeping partners faithful. It’s punishing any examples of non-conformity with their rigid world views. If non-conformity goes unpunished it threatens their rigid ideology. That’s why they must cancel anything that does not fit their beliefs.

that assumes a fair investigation, and an employer willing to exonerate her publicly. Her employer might not see it beneficial to declare there’s nothing there. I can see them letting the investigation run its course then issuing a simple one sentence statement: “Although our thorough...

You can say that again. Lol.

there are two threads totalling 54 pages of posts that provide evidence to the contrary. Composing that many posts is a lot of busy ness.

I’m not saying whether he’s an upgrade or not. Just saying misses don’t count. You asked how he would be an upgrade and I answered he’d be an upgrade if he made more tackles than the other guys. Counting missed tackles is counting the wrong thing. It’s like the error of putting armor on...

it seems there is a deep seated hatred of everybody by some on this board.

How many tackles does he make? Is that more than the player he’d replace? If it is he’s an upgrade. Whether he’s worth the asking price is a different question.

Maybe it will help if you explain to me what reason(s) she would have for not resigning when she is sidelined, unable to attend any official draft events, prohibited from publishing anything because she’s still employed even though suspended, has no corporate expense account, is most likely a...

Her bio on muckrack dot com also lists her as “Publisher and Lead Writer, Sports Illustrated”: I interview QBs in my spare time. Air Raid Certified. LSU alum. Cover CFB/NFL at USA TODAY SMG.

How about if her employer tells her she’s suspended pending investigation, and they told the NFL to not issue her credentials?

Or Jonathan went to Wolf and said “Remember, you have final say about draft picks. Also remember my dad and I have final say on your continued employment, and we just hired Mike Vrabel to run this team as head coach. Have I made myself sufficiently clear?”

Give it time. The Times was still organizing a thorough review. They barely had enough time to hire Ted Wells let alone explain the desired results to him.

Or they have been jealous of her. Good question, who is “we”? Other than someone I’ve never heard of that posted something on the internet?

She’s suspended, under investigation, with a contract that expires in just over two months. So she can’t work and has no real upside just lots of downside. What’s the benefit to her of hanging on? What’s the cost? What’s the benefit to her of resigning now? What does it cost her? By...

She could also be forestalling the investigation from turning over rocks unrelated to this particular incident. Maybe she discovered they weren’t half-assing the investigation and decided it was best to cut losses now. The Times could hang her on compromising her impartiality as an...