Recent content by Hoodie

It's because I haven't been watching. I haven't figured out a way to support my team without supporting the NFL. So I've gone cold turkey. It's been tough but so far I've managed it. If anyone can suggest a way can watch the games without allowing the NFL to count me as a viewer, I'd love to...

Don't the Patriots have a Patriots.com website in Chinese? The NFL had better not plan to send the Pats. Kraft should say a definitive no.

Mikey had the easiest job in the world during Red Sox season. He only had to work for a 1/2 hour. Wish that was my job.

Just saw a little clip of the Cavs arriving in Cleveland with the trophy and a little boy in the crowd said, "this is awesome!" it reminded me of my/our first time and brought a little tear to my eye. I'm not a basketball fan nor a LeBron James fan but remember that feeling and it's fun to see...

I just came by hoping someone would ask that.

Starting to worry that the court hasn't asked the NFL for a response.

Somebody has to win so I'll root for Joe Thronton and against Phil Kessel.

that maybe one of Goodell's reasons, I don't think it's the only one. he's also placating the other 31 for what they consider too light a punishment for Spygate, BB's lack of deference to the Commish and adherence to their stupid rules, other infractions (warm gatorade) and because they continue...

Apparently Florio is unaware that if you ask someone to submit a brief, they can say no.

Good lord, please don't tell me that's the exact quote. Does he not have an editor? It should be, "Where WERE Feinberg’s “concerns" as corrected in the thread title.

Here's the paragraph from the article. Why Kenneth Feinberg weighing in matters NFL Video Tom Brady facing Deflategate long shot despite en banc appeal petition by Michael McCann Feinberg may be the most influential voice yet to speak up on behalf of Brady. Feinberg is a legendary figure in...

Wallach is parsing the new brief now.

but he also says that Feinberg's brief should be given more weight because he has no stake in this fight. My point is that neither do the scientists. While I understand that this is no longer about the psi in footballs, ultimately the case is based on a violation that didn't happen.

McCann says, "For that reason, the amicus briefs filed on Tuesday—just like the amicus briefs filed last Wednesday by the New England Patriots and a group of scientists—should be viewed with appropriate caution." It's obvious what the Patriots' motivation is but what could 21 scientists...

My memory may be wrong too but I believe Goodell backtracked from Vincent imposed the discipline to he did it.