- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 35,852
- Reaction score
- 29,624
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Fine. His behavior was unethical. And I lost any respect I still had for him.There is no HIPAA law for reporters. His sources might have violated HIPAA, but that isn't Schefter's problem.
fair enoughYou can post about BB. Just post about BB in the BB thread.
It’s not as cut and dry as you think. If you obtain something unlawfully, it generally becomes unlawful to share it.There is no HIPAA law for reporters. His sources might have violated HIPAA, but that isn't Schefter's problem.
The only way Schefter can violate HIPAA laws is if he committed fraud to obtain medical records like claiming to be a player's relative to get medical records.
Fine. His behavior was unethical. And I lost any respect I still had for him.
It’s not as cut and dry as you think. If you obtain something unlawfully, it generally becomes unlawful to share it.
JPP sued ESPN and they settled, so ESPN wasn’t 100% in the clear as you suggest above.
**** you. Back on ignore, moron.I don't blame him. If a source gives a reporter information that is news, it is their obligation to report it if it confirmed as the facts.
It is always easier, but not always cheaper. ESPN fought it for a while but after losing several key court rulings, they saw the writing on the wall and settled.It is always easier to settle than to fight it.
**** you. Back on ignore, moron.
It is always easier, but not always cheaper. ESPN fought it for a while but after losing several key court rulings, they saw the writing on the wall and settled.
If they thought they were going to win, they wouldn’t have just coughed up millions.
He sued for 7 figures and won a bunch of pre-trial court rulings. When the case is going your way, you don't settle for pennies on the dollar.I am betting JPP didn't get a massive amount of money. And for a company like ESPN (Disney) whatever they paid JPP was probably a nothing payment for them.
If her husband doesn't divorce her then he's a ****. Once she cheats, she's for the streets.Id surmise that the odds of Russini being divorced are lower after resigning.
He crossed the line doing that. The way he reported on Haskin's death I thought was going to get cancelled. Regardless, women are walking on eggshells already and it gives women reporters who are actually good at their jobs a bad name.I don't blame him. If a source gives a reporter information that is news, it is their obligation to report it if it confirmed as the facts.
If they were at a private resort holding hands and looking the same way as Vrabel-Russini, then it would tell a different story. A very bizarre, uncomfortable one at that.If there's a video out there that can almost definitively say that the two of them shouldn't have been there I'm sure it will be released at some point. There has to be.
Still photos don't always tell the right story. I mean like I said before...
What's the matter, you don't like getting boners while reading PatsFans??
That is looking intimate to you? You must be a very horny guy.A man and a woman in a private setting looking intimate in several poses is a big deal.
Luckily, you're not biased at all. LOLa) we have very little "far left" in this country
b) the link you provided shows it as barely in the "left", there's zero use of "far" on that page
your own actual bias is showing
| 10 | 2K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 1 - April 16 (Through 26yrs)











