Triumph
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2004
- Messages
- 29,985
- Reaction score
- 23,272
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This is where we gather to follow things on Game Day. Obviously, emotions tend to be high so if anyone gets a little crazy, the use of the “Mute” button is encouraged on anyone who may be annoying to you to control your experience and to allow the moderators to also enjoy the game.
At the same time, please take a deep breath before over-reacting for the sake of making this a pleasant experience for everyone.
Why was he back there returning punts and he had to have known that the ball hit his helmet?keep Harry’s ass glued to the bench or cut him. one of the dumbest ST plays I’ve ever seen
BB's ability to lose important games and still maintain his cool (and not EVER insult his players) is one of his greatest skills. Who cares how he treats the media ? His players know what is to be expected and they also know the coach won't throw them under the bus.Well, this is great team building.
Yet he's added a lot in the running game through his blocking and has caught the ball when it has been thrown his direction.
It was a bad play by Harry but a worse coaching decision, IMO. I think, having seen the first punt, they expected the ball may roll (and therefore be easy to field), so they wanted someone back there to field it to prevent the Bills from downing the ball inside the 5 ... and maybe you're able to break a big return and get positive field position as a result. It appeared Gunner was also back, but positioned much further up the field than Harry, but I'd have to see the replay.
At any rate, the idea makes sense, but why you'd select that person to be Harry instead of someone like Bourne or Meyers is completely beyond me. Harry has no recent live-game experience fielding punts, so why have him do it under extremely adverse circumstances? He was setup to fail. He could have and should have done better but I don't want that one (admittedly, really bad) play to overshadow his generally positive contributions to the team/offense thus far.
As a final side-note, why they haven't thrown him 4-5 goal-line fades/slants/box-outs, or an occasional go-route when Mac is in the game and during a competitive stretch of play, is beyond me. He is extraordinarily successful on a very high percentage of those plays when given the opportunity, and (save for when Hoyer is in the game, late) they rarely give him much of a shot. I get you can't build an offense around one player, but attempting to manufacture some touches to maximize what seems to be a really strong skillset for contested/50-50 balls feels like it could be a good idea, especially when in the red-area and points are at a premium.
The bills path to victory is so narrow. They can’t stop the run & they can’t run the ball vs. nickel defenses. Hopefully Phillips is fine & they’ll have Dugger back for the second game to spy Allen.
I'll say it again but I would imagine Mac is not feeling real good today after a game plan that basically did not include him at all. I don't know if that's the best approach with Mac heading into the postseason where the weather will be a lot worse than it was last night which could potentially hurt his confidence.
It's also possible that he simply just doesn't have the arm to throw it all in the wind. Many of us wondered what he would look like when the weather turned bad and I think we got our answer last night. I really don't know how far we can go in the postseason if that's going to be their game plan in bad weather games with our offense.
The real question is how are their famous wings?I was at that game. Wind blew the north end goalpost off-kilter and they had to stop play to straighten it back up. It was hard to stand, wind gusts would blow you back down into your seat. An experience I'll never forget.
The real question is how are their famous wings?