FACT: The GB Packers have $110 million in profits over the past 3 seasons (funny how you focus on just the one year which was unusually low and not their historical average).
I focus on TODAY. Their CURRENT financials.
They are in business to make a profit FOR THEIR SHAREHOLDERS.
In what world should they lose 72,000,000 and then donate 40,000,000 to players?
FACT: They had $477.2 million in revenue last year. Losing 16.7% of that would be a sh*t sandwich, no doubt, but it would not be debilitating nor would it be devastating. They would be able to maintain themselves as a functioning business.
they would lose 72,000,000. How do they pay expenses that exceed revenue by 72,000,000?
FACT: They have more than enough in profits over the past 3 years to cover the financial hit.
So now I get it.
They made money 4 years ago so they should react to losing 72,000,000 by donating 40,000,000 to the players because business is about breaking even, and losing 3 years worth of profit (which is either distributed to shareholders or kept for future capital expenses) is a wonderful thing. They are so happy about it they will donate 40,000,000 to the players.
Honestly you should just stop digging your hole deeper.
You are seriously saying that as a shareholder of the Green Bay packers the best response management can have to losing 72,000,000 is to take the negotiated labor concessions of 40,000,000 and say no thanks.
They should take their 50/50 revenue split with players and since they lost 80,000,000 in revenue they should pay the players 40,000,000 more than they have to.
Come in just stop responding. You have r dug yourself in a hole and you don’t have the ability to accept that what you are stating is literally the stupidest thing owners could do. I would struggle to come up with a worse business plan if I tried.