PatriotsNumero1Fan
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2017
- Messages
- 7,256
- Reaction score
- 4,402
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Ok. I thought you had been defending the decision.
It actually makes NO sense to me that if Rowe knew he was starting over Butler, that he would said he learned of it only right before the game as has been reported, and he had no idea that Butler would not be playing. That would make no sense for him to sayReasonably looking at it all it makes more sense to me that Rowe is covering for Butler a bit and giving a non-answer than the alternative because of all the other things that decision would affect.
It was sarcasm. I understood your point. The worst defensive playoff performance during the Bill Belichick era to a backup quarterback, no less.you misunderstood me. I was agreeing with you. Patricia wanted Butler on the field.
I will wait to judge. I mean what if he showed to a meeting drunk or missed a meeting drunk? (JUST AN EXAMPLE of a potential reason OK?) If it is something on that level I would still be kind of pissed but would support the DNP coaches decision. If it is something really silly then I think in a close game like that where the D was the problem... then Belichick is like Grady Little to me, except one with rings..Still trying to understand why butler didn't play. It has to be one of the biggest goofs in super bowl history.
I get it, but I would support Belichick DNP coaches decision on that level of offense.showed up last night drunk and stoned
close how? I don't see in your post an explanation? Just asking because I was want to know one.We’re going to find out eventually but I think I’m close at least.
The dreaded Grady Little reference - I knew it was coming.I will wait to judge. I mean what if he showed to a meeting drunk or missed a meeting drunk? (JUST AN EXAMPLE of a potential reason OK?) If it is something on that level I would still be kind of pissed but would support the DNP coaches decision. If it is something really silly then I think in a close game like that where the D was the problem... then Belichick is like Grady Little to me, except one with rings..
I will wait to judge. I mean what if he showed to a meeting drunk or missed a meeting drunk? (JUST AN EXAMPLE of a potential reason OK?) If it is something on that level I would still be kind of pissed but would support the DNP coaches decision. If it is something really silly then I think in a close game like that where the D was the problem... then Belichick is like Grady Little to me, except one with rings..
his ego..... or something worse which I doubt tho.You’re helping out the Eagles. Why?
I’ve been up all night reading and thinking of various scenarios. The only one that feels right is like this. Butler comes late. B.B. lets that slide but during practice, Butler was either not cutting it or giving problems or both. B.B. sets him down and doesn’t say anything because of the outrage from everyone, me included. Butler has done things this year and copped an attitude a bunch of times. He’s got a bad attitude about money, seemed very upset about Gilmore who has now showed why he is a top corner. Butler is great and I’d have played him no matter what his attitude was like, even if he showed up last night drunk and stoned, he could not have did a worse job even if he stood in the middle of the field and drooled during the plays or even laid down and passed out. Might have been an improvement. I came to this theory by piecing together what we do know. Eric Rowe has nothing to gain by lying here nor does Gilmore so it’s credible that they didn’t know. Butler was upset. Now, that would indicate something way out of the ordinary like the flu really wiped him out or he got a ****ty attitude. Nothing else fits. That display of horrible defense coupled with guys not knowing and all that’s been said. B.B. doesn’t throw super bowl games in childish spite fits. The mans allergic to losses and strikes me like a guy who hates losing. Why else would he resign from the jets in one day? We’re going to find out eventually but I think I’m close at least.
Again DMac and other captains are on the record saying they knew it well before.
It also logically makes no sense that Rowe just took Butlers snaps because there is no way they would have played Butler against Jeffrey. I dont see how they would move the entire coverage responsibilities right before the game. Especially for Chung that would be extremely difficult unless he was never meant to cover Ertz anyway.
Reasonably looking at it all it makes more sense to me that Rowe is covering for Butler a bit and giving a non-answer than the alternative because of all the other things that decision would affect.
We can speculate all day about this but for me it comes down to one thing.
This is a better defense with Malcolm Butler on the field case closed.
Badman should have not played more than Malcolm regardless of the year he had (which was at worst better than average).
For a coach who always plays the players that give him the best chance to win the game (which was Malcolm playing 98% of the snaps over 18 games), he chose last night to deviate from that philosophy.
It makes zero sense
So now, all of a sudden, Bademosi is a better cornerback than Butler?his ego..... or something worse which I doubt tho.
The coaching was terrible especially to start. Rowe didn't cover Jeffry for long. They switched Gilmore onto him. Rowe was then tasked with covering either Smith or Agholor, both of which were terrible match-ups for him and both of which were better suited for Butler. So, whatever way you want to cut it, BB doesn't get a pass for this.
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 2 - April 17 (Through 26yrs)











