manxman2601
PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2011
- Messages
- 39,889
- Reaction score
- 45,436
I agree with you that trading a future 1st isn't a BB move. Normally it's not something that I would entertain either, but I see this as potentially an exceptional circumstance. The amount of underclassman declaring this year (including some RS Sophomores) not only makes this years draft much stronger, but also makes next years draft weaker. If there is someone there in the middle of the 2nd that would likely go late in the 1st next year (Yankey?) then I think the value is decent. I also have confidence we will be picking late again next year so I'm not too concerned about a Wash/Stl type situation.
The other thing I would take into consideration is what long term needs we would have going forward. With this mock I think we solidify our O-line, we get a long term replacement for Wilfork and we get a few more weapons for Brady. I know there are always needs but I think with this draft there wouldn't be any positions we are in dire need to address with a 1st round pick in 2015. The only exception could be OT if Solder or Vollmer have a significant injury.
I'm not sure next years draft will necessarily be weaker because of this years declarations. At one point, If you just counted seniors, Khalil Mack was the highest ranked player -now look at the draft. We'll just get the same declarations next year and so on creating a new draft zeitgeist where Juniors will be considered in the same way Seniors are now and that a Senior year will be considered an injury redshirt year.












