- Joined
- Jul 13, 2009
- Messages
- 12,041
- Reaction score
- 11,242
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Offense will put up yards and struggle a bit in red zone. Brady will take a LOT of hits this year as the Pats go to a more spread offense.
A little less passing, but a lot more running.
Get the play-action going to make things a little easier for the new WRs.
For the RBs, Ridley and Vereen did great last season, but it was only their second seasons and they are only going to get better. Ridley added muscle and will be even harder to take down. Hopefully he can kill the clock late in games. Look for Shane to get lots of catches from the backfield as the new change of pace back. He has the potential to be better than Danny Woodhead. Bolden will get opportunities to contribute, I don't expect Leon Washington to get much snaps on offense because of ST and I'm not sure if Blount makes the team or not.
For the WRs, it's deeper, faster, bigger and more physical than last year's group. But, a lot more unknowns than last year. Dobson and Boyce need to be able to complement Amendola on the outside, but even Danny can play outside at times too. Dobson, Amendola, Boyce, Edelman, Jones/Jenkins is definitely a lot more than just Welker, Lloyd, Edelman (only played 9 games), an old Deion Branch and Donte Stallworth for one game. It's hard to tell how good this group could be, but it is a step in the right direction in addressing the weaknesses from last season. Instead of 1-2 guys getting most of the yards and the rest get little, it could be more of a balanced production, more like a 900-1000 yd guy, a 700-800 guy and maybe two 400-500 yd guys.
For the TEs, I don't know what's going to happen with Hernandez and Gronkowski. I can guess that Gronk will be back Week 1, but not at 100%. But I hope Jake Ballard can at least contribute to the offense at least a good bit of what he did in 2011 with the Giants. He's big and could be a good red zone threat. Interested in Sudfeld too.
I think the offense will still average over 30 PPG, due to Tom Brady's ability to "make things work" and the fact that the defense will be much better and force even more turnovers to give Brady a shorter field. You also have to factor in Leon Washington and his abilities in the return game too.
It's only June, but I just hope that in the playoffs, the offense won't struggle again when they face teams that will take away the middle of the field and test them vertically. And who knows if the whole offense will be healthy? Injuries always happen.
We had a defense that got three and outs and gave us a short field to work with. Along with the fact in general offense was down that year and the past few years offenses have been higher scoring overall.
The second best offense that year was 26.8 PPG. That would not even be top 5 in todays league.
I don't think the solution to a lack of quality WRs is to go to a spread offense...
I'd be more than happy for the O to regress a little if it means the D improves tremendously.
I don't think the solution to a lack of quality WRs is to go to a spread offense...
You have to also factor in the fact that Leon Washington will be manning the kickoff return game, maybe Edelman again for the punt return too. That will also lead to shorter fields for Brady and the offense to work with.
Even though the defense has been bad the past few seasons, they have always had a knack for getting lots of turnovers. That will also give Brady and the offense a shorter field.
But in the playoffs, they struggle to force turnovers. In the Jets playoff game in 2011, the Ravens/Giants games in 2012 (I chose the Ravens game b/c Brady struggled, even though they won) and the Ravens game in 2013, the Patriots defense only forced ONE turnover combined in those four games.
B/c of that, the offense had to mostly work with a long field.
I know it's off topic, but I expect the defense to improve greatly with the continuity in the secondary, the veteran presence of Adrian Wilson in the SS position, the additions of Armstead and Kelly to the interior pass rush, and the year two improvement of Chandler Jones, Donta Hightower, Alphonso Dennard and Tavon Wilson.
Worst-case scenario: Ridley suffers another big concussion, Gronk's recovery is slow and he misses essentially the entire season, Hernandez is completely gone, Amendola gets injured, and Brady takes a beating, along with the defense completely sucking. Pats in that scenario still finish 9-7 and are in the hunt for the playoffs.
Best-case scenario: Gronk is back after the 8-week PUP time is up, Hernandez is exonerated and plays, O-line is dominant, Amendola is awesome and healthy, and the defense takes a huge step forward. Pats in that scenario finish 14-2 and the #1 seed in the AFC, and make the Super Bowl.
Probable scenario: Gronk misses 8 weeks, Hernandez is suspended by the league and misses the year, Amendola misses a couple of games, running game is solid, defense improves from last year, and Brady is Brady. Pats in that scenario finish 12-4 and the #2 seed in the AFC, and are playing in the AFCCG at a minimum.
I don't see gronk going on PUP. It makes absolutely no sense.
If I understand the rules right, here are his options:
(1) PUP - can come back in 8 weeks
(2) plays right away - not happening
(3) goes on IR - can't play all year
But maybe there was a rule change last year allowing them to have one guy on some sort of recallable IR or something like that? But what do you think they'll do with him?
If I understand the rules right, here are his options:
(1) PUP - can come back in 8 weeks
(2) plays right away - not happening
(3) goes on IR - can't play all year
But maybe there was a rule change last year allowing them to have one guy on some sort of recallable IR or something like that? But what do you think they'll do with him?
From our archive - this week all-time:
June 4 - June 19 (Through 26yrs)











