- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 43,717
- Reaction score
- 24,321
I keep reading this lazy, film study stuff about Alshon Jeffery, but I can't find where its actually coming from. Everything I have heard about his work ethic is that its fantastic and he is willing to do whatever it takes to win. The weight issue is a concern to me because he did balloon up in the offseason, but by game time he was in shape and looked good. And I don't see him taking any plays off in the NFL. When he actually has a QB that can get him the ball, I think he will be fine. He has all the physical tools to be a #1 reciever in the NFL, and I think he is just being hurt by the lack of production this season because of the poor QB play. In the late 1st round you don't get these type of prospects very often.
You seemed to ignore his route running. You can't blame poor route running on the QB. The other thing is that Jeffrey is not a burner. He's a mid 4.5 guy. So, you can expect him to get a lot of press coverage at the Pro level.
I just don't see him as a "Patriots" Guy.
I understand that the Pats haven't drafted an OLB under 6'3" in the early rounds of the draft. But how many college players that have entered the draft, have already played in a very similar system to the one the Pats run, and have been one of the most dominant LBers in college football? I don't care how tall he is because I know he can play OLB in this system, because I have seen him do it for the last few years in the SEC. If that isn't enough to warrant a high draft pick from BB then he will never draft an OLB in the 1st round.
No.. What you know is that Upshaw can be a 3-4 1 Gap OLB. That isn't playing in the Pats system. And while you "don't care how tall he is" BB DOES care. He looks for his OLBs to be in the 6-3 to 6-5 range if he's going to draft them high. Otherwise, he'd prefer to draft them in the later rounds.
Whats wrong with a possesion reciever? Sure you could class him as that, but he brings a lot to the table. He is not only very effective in the screen game and on the short and intermediate routes, but he is also a very effective deep threat. He's got decent speed, great body control, tracks the ball well and has good hands. Just because he isn't Mike Wallace doesn't mean he couldn't be very effective as a "possession reciver". And the 7th round grade that CBS Sports gave him is garbage. He is a 3rd/4th round prospect, that could even sneak into the 2nd if he tests well.
The rest of the stuff I think I covered in my previous post
What's wrong with a possession receiver? Nothing. Except that he'd be the #5 WR and brings nothing else. He doesn't do kick returns. He doesn't do punt returns. And while Criner may be an effective deep threat in College, a guy running (at best) in the mid 4.5ss is not going to be a successful deep threat unless he's got Jerry Rice abilities. And Criner is no Jerry Rice.
As for your opinion of CBS Sports/NFLDraftScout.com, even Scott Wright of Draftcountdown has Criner ranked as only the 21st best WR. You just haven't supported this idea that Criner is going to, somehow, turn into this low 2nd/3rd round pick.
Last edited: