Everything.
Why dont you provide facts that prove me wrong? Youre one of the biggest supporters of NE players that eventually turn out to be busts, so this is nothing new from your camp.
No, I don't think so. How about this: since you're the one making the assertion (that McCourty sucks), why don't
you provide the evidence to make your case. The onus isn't on me here.
Heres a question for you. Why doesnt McCourty have a new contract? Hernandez and Gronk both got new deals and all 3 are from the same draft with McCourty being the 1st round pick. Since you think McCourty is so good, shouldnt the Pats lock him up with another deal? Why do him like your other binky Chung who will be hitting the unemployment line in the near future?
Seriously, are you just gish galloping here? Since when was Chung my binky?
How many Patriots players got new deal before their rookie contract(s) expired? Is it your postulation that in the post-Gronk/Hernandez era the only way we can divine the FO's positive assessment of a player is if they get a new deal before their existing contract is up?
In reality, the answer to your question is so simple it's hard to believe (well, no, it actually isn't) you didn't know the answer when you typed it: Gronk and Hernandez were obviously on elite trajectories and the FO did the smart thing and re-upped them (so they could keep both) before they became prohibitively expensive.
But they are for the reasons I stated.
You didn't state any reasons. You stated one "reason" which smacks eerily of something you just pulled out of your ass. Given that, please substantiate your assertion that BM was drafted to play cornerback.
Reed will definitely start and McCourty will have to earn his job. More than likely Wilson wont he head and shoulders above McCourty so he will get the nod.
No. If Reed is signed and all other things remain equal, McCourty will sleepwalk into the other starting position. The only way this changes is if Wilson makes strides and the FO decides they want to move him back to CB (a bad idea in my estimation).
No. You call it the way
you think it is, and given our past interactions, as you well know, what
you think and
reality coincide roughly 25 percent of the time, at best.
The sports writers are wrong and the pass defense didnt improve until Talib landed here and Dennard took the other CB spot. The Pats spent more draft picks on the CB position with Talib because what they had wasnt good enough. You dont keep bringing in players if eveything is hunky dory at a position.
No. The improvement in pass defense was both a result of Talib taking the starting cornerback spot
and McCourty stepping in and putting out the dumpster fire at safety (as well as Dennard's ascension). The fact that you are unable/unwilling to recognize this beggars belief.
The pass defense still inst good enough and thats why NE needs to go after Reed. McCourty doesnt strike fear in any team.
The reason the pass defense isn't good enough is because there is still a gaping hole in the form of one Steve Gregory, and also there's a need for more depth at CB (which would be mitigated if Ras-I could stay healthy). It has absolutely nothing to do with McCourty.
You might think so, but I choose to live in reality.
LOL. I know this isn't the political forum but...really?
Really?