Welcome to PatsFans.com

Wilfork's injury

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Willie55, Dec 13, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    27,488
    Likes Received:
    643
    Ratings:
    +1,887 / 31 / -48

    No Jersey Selected

    First of all, Belichick isn't changing to a one-gap. I would like to see us go with a one-gap, personally, but it isn't happening. The two-gap is BB's defense. Second of all, I'm not going to be. I've said before that I don't think the Pats will re-sign Wilfork. But it's not going to be a statement on his ability. It will just be a poor move that will be an attempt to save the team some money so they can extend Brady and re-sign one of Mankins or Neal. If you think it will be a statement on Wilfork's ability as a player, then perhaps you would like to explain Asante Samuel (who currently leads his new team in interceptions)?
     
  2. The Dynasty

    The Dynasty In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I completely agree, couldnt agree more
     
  3. unoriginal

    unoriginal In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,269
    Likes Received:
    78
    Ratings:
    +231 / 3 / -1

    Not to beat up on a poster in the minority, but I have no idea what this is supposed to mean.
     
  4. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I think Wilfork is good but not worth whatever price tag he wants. I'd rather have that money spent on getting better at LB. Plenty of teams around the NFL are proving you don't have to have a "stud NT". I just feel that re-signing Wilfork isn't going to make this team any better.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2009
  5. The Dynasty

    The Dynasty In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    When teams run the ball down our throats next year if he isnt resigned, you might rethink that thought.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2009
  6. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    27,488
    Likes Received:
    643
    Ratings:
    +1,887 / 31 / -48

    No Jersey Selected

    Wilfork is the most important player on this defense. The reason he gets "driven off the ball sometimes" is that his job is to sumo two guys on the LOS, something that he does with regularity that dwarfs the amount of times those two guys back him up. In this system, he is the best that money can buy because of said ability. With the linebacker position, I would love to see an upgrade over Guyton. But you should remember that, even in this team's heyday, they didnt have stud all-world linebackers at their disposal. They had dependable, hard nosed lunch pail type of guys that came to work to do their job. Now we already have one "stud" type of linebacker in Mayo in there. What we need to do is surround him with those same types of guys in the mold of Bruschi, Johnson, Vrabel, and Colvin.
     
  7. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Probably not because I don't think they're very good at stopping the run right now. Their 17th in the NFL against the run. You really think signing Wilfork to a ton of money is the right thing to do? That money needs to be spread out to get more balanced on defense.
     
  8. The Dynasty

    The Dynasty In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Yes I would do anything in my power to resign Wilfork. He is the most valuable guy on our defense. They're 17th in the league right now with Vince, I dont even want to know what we would be without him. If we dont resign him then that adds another need to our list, a NT
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2009
  9. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I agree with what you're saying but the Pats have been a victim of their own scheme since 2005. Their options at replacing players on defense are very limited. We see how picky the Pats are at getting LB's and how they constantly favor D-line over everything else. If you can't find guys to run the 2 gap like Wilfork or better yet Ted Washington, you should probably change your scheme. But we both agree that will probably never happen.
     
  10. KontradictioN

    KontradictioN Do you even lift? PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    27,488
    Likes Received:
    643
    Ratings:
    +1,887 / 31 / -48

    No Jersey Selected

    I blame 2005 on a stroke suffered by Bruschi in which he was never really the same player afterward. They've preferred D-Line because the D-Line is what is most important in the 3-4. However, this is probably the offseason in which the LB corps gets a significant overhaul. I sincerely hope we find those lunch pail guys that buy into the system the way Cox, Bruschi, and Vrabel did. Get a more reliable ILB next to Mayo and the run defense improves dramatically, IMO.
     
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2009
  11. SeymourTrophies

    SeymourTrophies Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job

    Joined:
    Dec 10, 2007
    Messages:
    1,092
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #93 Jersey

    No way to we let Vince walk without getting something for him. We'll get something for him and spread the talent around our D. Someone is sure to bite on him.
     
  12. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +357 / 26 / -4

    I agree with your assessment of the value of Wilfork to us and to other 3-4 2-gap teams. However, I don't expect the patriots to win a bidding war for Wilfork. I expect that we will put an exclusive rights franchise tag on him to keep him for 2010 while the team tries to develop another NT for 2011.

     
  13. The Dynasty

    The Dynasty In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Yeah I agree with that as well, I dont see the Pats winning a battle with money either. I think if he leaves this team we will see the same thoughts that some people are having now about the loss of Seymour and how valuable he is to the team. I think the loss of Wilfork would be much worse than the loss of Seymour is.
     
  14. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +357 / 26 / -4

    The difference for me is that Wilfork will have played out his contract and played one year beyond. This seems reasonable for a top player and for the team.

    With Seymour, we unloaded him with a year left on his contract.

     
  15. The Dynasty

    The Dynasty In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2008
    Messages:
    2,294
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Well, we also got a 1st round and potential top 10 pick for Seymour.

    Do you think we should have redone Wilforks deal a few years ago? He is the only first rounder in his class thats still playing with his original contract
     
  16. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,939
    Likes Received:
    134
    Ratings:
    +357 / 26 / -4

    Tha attempt was made to extend Wilfork. The team and Wilfork just couldn't make it happen.

    With regard to Seymour, we can always give up top players for future top draft choices. So, why didn't we also trade Wilfork for a future choice before this season started? Why didn't we trade Samuel?

    Belichick didn't like having Seymour around and got what he could. But make no mistake, the Super Bowl chances of the 2009 patriots took a huge hit when Seymour went out the door.

     
  17. SVN

    SVN Hall of Fame Poster

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2005
    Messages:
    22,811
    Likes Received:
    93
    Ratings:
    +201 / 3 / -0

    if wilfork and warren both miss nextweek's game its going to hard stopping jackson and lynch.
     
  18. Fencer

    Fencer Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,914
    Likes Received:
    49
    Ratings:
    +151 / 2 / -15

    #12 Jersey

    LOL, pretty literally!
     
  19. Fencer

    Fencer Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,914
    Likes Received:
    49
    Ratings:
    +151 / 2 / -15

    #12 Jersey

    Wilfork usually has 1 or 2 bad games per season. What's more, even his good games don't lead to stats.

    Obviously, he's little more than a JAG.
     
  20. betterthanthealternative

    betterthanthealternative In the Starting Line-Up

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2006
    Messages:
    2,297
    Likes Received:
    43
    Ratings:
    +129 / 4 / -0

    The Seymour trade story, as told by BB, was that they first offered Wilfork to the Raiders.

     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>