SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yeah, that's the new sprots reporting. Not repoting sports or commentating, but being "enteraining." It is no longer about the sprot itself, and the nuances of the sport, but who can be the most outrageous and go highest over the top.Absolutely! It doesn't bother me one little bit. 3 or 4 people doing nothing more than reporting the same subject on the same show is a major yawn.
Hahaha nothing makes my day brighter than Despair Inc. Love those things.
Yeah, that's the new sprots reporting. Not repoting sports or commentating, but being "enteraining." It is no longer about the sprot itself, and the nuances of the sport, but who can be the most outrageous and go highest over the top.
So many people love this. I despise it. I would rather have three of four guys commenting intelligently on a controversial play, than to have the commentators get into arguments with each other based on pumping up the teams they played for and what teams they dissing the teams that beat them when they were players.
Don't go giving clowns a bad name!?!?
Flat out - - - - Marshall Faulk is a total a$s. A pathetic loser.
You know it, I know it, we all know it.
Still remember his pitiful, sullen, almost teary-eyed comment after the game,
"Sometimes the best team doesn't win"!?!?
How to make a whining, classless idiot out of himself on national TV.
If you look up the phrase "poor, just can't believe it, loser" in a dictionary his picture will be there.
Yeah, that's the new sprots reporting. Not repoting sports or commentating, but being "enteraining." It is no longer about the sprot itself, and the nuances of the sport, but who can be the most outrageous and go highest over the top.
So many people love this. I despise it. I would rather have three of four guys commenting intelligently on a controversial play, than to have the commentators get into arguments with each other based on pumping up the teams they played for and what teams they dissing the teams that beat them when they were players.
I'd love to hear Belichick comment on this candidly.
YouTube - Cassel Hassle
Have you guys seen this? I never saw it posted and frankly I thought it was pure gold!
You saw it after the Jets game too, where Sanders (arrogant, but pretty objective) called Favre's TD a pick play and Mariucci is saying it's a beauty play.
Harrison hammed up the tumble to get the refs to notice, not to get a wrong call, imo.
Reminder: NFL Video Galleries
I guess this stuff is par for the course, but I just think guys like Sanders, Woodson and even Rich Eisen do a better job of talking football than blinder-ized guys like Faulk and Dukes.
Question: I know these guys have their favorite teams, but should guys with a bias this big really be commentating games or talking post-game in analysis of a team they hate/love?
I know there are a lot of Pats haters, but Marshall Faulk is one that seems like he is personally a real prick.