Robo
Is it possible for you and the Goodell apologists to respond to my inquiry, rather than going off on a tangent calling it conspiracy theory.
Name one decision that Goodell has made that wasn't extra ordinarily detrimental to the Pats starting with the unprecendentedly high penalty for a rules violation, the leaking of the tapes to Fox, the destruction of the Pats tapes, the failure to investigate the Jets vilation of the same rule in 2006, the reported collusion between the colts and Titans which was put on the record by a player for the Titans. Just one.
Now you have introduced the element of that Goodell's incompetence as an excuse for what happened. This wasn't part of your argument before. On that point, I have to agree with you. However with the string of decisions involving, I am beyond the point of chalking it up to coincidences and incompetance. Sometimes when it squacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it is a duck, not a goose with bad feathers.
I also find it ironic that you admit that If Walsh, known liar and thief , comes up with some other BS other than the tapes, Goodelll will investigate it, yet when a player states that there was collusion between teams to throw a game that's not worthy of investigation.
I am sure Kraft takes great comfort in knowing that you don't think Goodell won't punish them anymore. Take it to the bank that if Goodell opens another investigation more punishment is coming which I am sure Kraft will be thanking his good friend for.