Big-T
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2009
- Messages
- 7,902
- Reaction score
- 3,695
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I gave the OP 10 minutes to show a link that Clayton even breathed this.
He has 4 more minutes.
Then this thread disappears.
Who says he'd be exclusively used as a TE/Hback?
There is also the possibility that he'd be willing to restructure his contract to mitigate his impact on the payroll.
you never knowcan he rush the passer?
Wasnt Tebow the QB that made Hernandez a star in Florida? Tebow has no quality TE in Denver, plus they run the ball a lot.
Because the premise of the thread is that he won't be starting either way.Where else are you going to put him?
Let me get this straight, he will agree to a paycut to go from starting QB on a playoff team to not a QB, or a 4th string QB for what reason?
Where else are you going to put him?
Let me get this straight, he will agree to a paycut to go from starting QB on a playoff team to not a QB, or a 4th string QB for what reason?
Someone already posted one in the thread:
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england-patriots/messageboard/10/905040-tebow-pats-rumor.html#post2990066
Oh God.He'd be the back up QB, not 4th string.
Decoy of what? How about we use RBs to run short yardage, receivers to receiver and blockers to block? I think that works better than putting a poor QB in those roles because you like him and want to find a place to get him on the field.He'd also be a short yardage running option, a decoy, red zone threat, mobile blocker...
Brady is crazy efficient sneaking the ball, but it might be a good idea to protect him a little more in those situations as he ages. Any hit Tommy avoids is a big positive in my eyes.
Because the premise of the thread is that he won't be starting either way.
Oh God.
Decoy of what? How about we use RBs to run short yardage, receivers to receiver and blockers to block? I think that works better than putting a poor QB in those roles because you like him and want to find a place to get him on the field.
Oh God again. You want to trade for Tebow to take TFB off the field in the red zone.
You'd legitimately be more comfortable starting Hoyer than Tebow if Brady had to sit out a game or two?
He'd be the back up QB, not 4th string.
He'd also be a short yardage running option, a decoy, red zone threat, mobile blocker...
Brady is crazy efficient sneaking the ball, but it might be a good idea to protect him a little more in those situations as he ages. Any hit Tommy avoids is a big positive in my eyes.
You'd legitimately be more comfortable starting one of Hoyer or Mallett than Tebow if Brady had to sit out a game or two?
Last edited by LetsGoPats36; Today at 04:54 PM..
YES.
......and so would 31 other teams. You'll get to see for yourself quite clearly if Hoyer and Tebow get to test free agency at the same time.
How exactly will he be the backup QB for NE when as I've mentioned numerous times, he isn't capable of making multiple reads. How in the world do you see him then fitting in NE's offense? You can't possibly think they'd do what Denver was forced to do and have a separate offense designed especially for him.
Running backs are usually short yardage options.
He won't be a decoy if you know he going to run.
I think we're in OK shape with red zone targets, at least we're not so desperate as to having put in our "backup QB" as a receiver.
Again, you want your "backup QB" in there as a blocker?
His ego is way too big to allow himself play any other position.
Finally, with Tebow come the Tebowmaniacs.