- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 16,482
- Reaction score
- 1,343
Good call on Cunningham!
OLB Jermaine Cunningham -- 96
Didn't take long for ADs number to be used...lets hope this 96 has a winning attitude
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Good call on Cunningham!
OLB Jermaine Cunningham -- 96
Good call on Cunningham!
OLB Jermaine Cunningham -- 96
... 32 for a CB is a little strange. 31 would've been a better choice if it was available.
Actually when I saw the 32 the first player I thought of was Willie Clay - and the interception against Jax to essentially save that AFCCG.
wow your right big play Willie Clay whear #32 he was one of my fav pats in the 90's
Yes, BUT he was a safety!
Hey, this is pretty weird...
35-Pat(rick) Pas(s)
35-Pat Pas(chall)
Is 44 taken on the team? Hernandez getting Dallas Clark's number wouldve been cooler than 46.
Thanks, I had a strange felling he would wear something in the 90's because most of the OLB's on the team wear #'s in the 90's. Also, I thought 96 would look good on him.Good call on Cunningham!
OLB Jermaine Cunningham -- 96
I doubt he keeps that number. I see him taking #80.Is 44 taken on the team? Hernandez getting Dallas Clark's number wouldve been cooler than 46.
Zoltan should have been double ZerOOes
I doubt he keeps that number. I see him taking #80.
Is 44 taken on the team? Hernandez getting Dallas Clark's number wouldve been cooler than 46.
Why the hell would we not allow his # to be used? Should we hold out on Jabar Gaffney's # too?
I guess that would be the right thing to do
Jabbar's number being used by a rookie would be even more disrespectful than Reche's
and I will argue this belief with pats1 & shmessy until the cows come home
It's assigned to FB Eric Kettani according to the Pats...
Umm, who?
44 would have been much tighter. 47 would've been alright too. Has anyone worn it since Robert Edwards?