- Joined
- Sep 8, 2012
- Messages
- 5,131
- Reaction score
- 4,242
By "anything" I mean the ultimate achievement of winning a Super Bowl. Without the rings, Slater would still have his career. Slater won a ring in 2014, 2016 and 2018. Brady was brilliant in 2014 and 2016 (should have won NFL MVP) and he was heroic in both postseason (including beating the Legion of Boom and then engineering the greatest comeback of all time). Brady obviously didn't do it alone, and every teammate who took a snap in either season was a relative factor, but I think it's fair to say Brady is very likely the only quarterback (in the league) of either season who could have pulled out those Super Bowl wins.Your words aren't being twisted. And if you think they are, quite frankly that's on you and how you present your argument. Use better words.
You said, and I quote
"Slater's best years don't amount to anything without all of Brady's brilliance and heroics throughout the entire course of Slater's career."
Do you get the inference you just made with "your words"?
He was great in the 2018 AFC playoffs and again in particular only he could have pulled off those three consecutive 3rd-10s in OT @KAN. He had his quintessential 4th quarter game-winning drive in SB 53 but that was classic 'team effort' victory.
Ultimately, I never said Brady's teammates "didn't play a factor." I didn't make the inference either. Every single teammate who played in the games contributed to the overall success achieved by the team, i.e. played a factor. My contention is without Brady's contributions (which could not be duplicated by any other quarterback), his teammates aren't wearing (multiple) rings.