JoeSixPat
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2004
- Messages
- 10,671
- Reaction score
- 1,043
Probably the best post in this thread for summarizing this point of view is Post 58.
I guess I wasn't aware that I had signed a covenant when I registered on Patsfans to discuss topics only as Mike Reiss or the OP frames them; in this case, whether the Pats would have Pisa "on their radar" instead of whether Pisa was a good fit in the defense, which is what this thread is mostly about.
Exactly. Everyone should agree to be a bit more respectful of others perspectives.
The OP suggests that the Patriots might be considering Tinoisamoa
And more than a few fellow Pats fans openly chide and mock him and others because clearly, from their perspective, the OP doesn't understand why Tinoisamoa is not a fit here and Belichick would never consider him.
Then Mike Reiss suggests that the Patriots might be considering Tinoisamoa
and SMY suggests that the Patriots might be considering Tinoisamoa
And Patriots Football Weekly suggests that the Patriots might consider Tinosamoa
And they continue to deny that the Patriots could ever be interested in Tinosamoa.
And then the Patriots actually call in Tinosamoa for an interview - clearly expressing interest.
Is there an apology to the OP? Nope. The same people who mocked him, who have been proven wrong now assert that the Patriots only have an "interest" in players they actually sign.
As much as they might all protest, I think they know now they were wrong and probably won't be quite so righteous next time there's a situation even if they think they're right and everyone else is wrong.
Last edited: