I don't even had a dog in this fight, because I didn't really get into this on this thread. All I've really said is that the evidence is stronger that they didn't want the guy for the linebacking corps than that they did, given that they didn't sign him and opted for someone else instead. I said that we don't know why he was brought in. I said that if further information came out, it could change the argument. Using a visit to go above "absolutely no interest" is foolish, though, given the Patriots proclivity towards bringing players in and the ridiculously low bar that you set with that phrasing.
I do love the "absolutely no interest in" argument, though, because it is so foolish. It sort of ignores the reality that the Patriots would have some level of interest in every person in the world who might possibly be good enough to play NFL football and makes it seem as if bringing a player in, or even mentioning his name, is essentially the same as offering him $30 million a season. Of course, Lenon was brought in before Tinoisamoa, according to Reiss, thus undercutting that "top of the list" argument, but we'll just ignore that. The omitting of the special teams possibilities, something Reiss addressed in his post-signing analysis, is also a nice touch on your part.
Patriots hosted Paris Lenon - Reiss' Pieces - Boston.com
Additional thought on Paris Lenon signing - Reiss' Pieces - Boston.com
The bottom line is that reporters speculated that this was a guy the Patriots would want (top of the list, per Mike Reiss) and posters speculated that this was a guy that would not fit the Patriots' linebacking corps. To date, whether you like it or not, the information we have indicates that those posters were right and the reporters were wrong. The rest is just splitting hairs about the word 'interest'.