Off The Grid
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2010
- Messages
- 9,153
- Reaction score
- 4,341
Per usual, a very intriguing and rarely addressed Point with a very insightful Angle, Sister.
It's a fascinating Aspect of this Great Game, is it not?? The Gap between Market Value and Belichickian Value. How far does Coach Bill press his advantage, considering that every Trade Down both captures a portion of it and yet heightens the risk to the coveted player??
That's already factored into the "Belichickian Value."
If Belichick felt the difference in utility between McCourty and the next player on his board was bigger than the value of the picks he could get by trading down, he'd have taken McCourty at 23.
Interesting Argument, though of course you are talking about a different thing than I.
I refer only to "Absolute" Belichickian Value ~ the Value of the Player ~ in terms of Draft Position ~ as assessed by Coach Bill Belichick, Croatian Mad Man.
Even so, the Angle you draw into the discussion ~ the Absolute Belichickian Value, as I've defined it, juxtaposed with ~ I won't say "against" ~ the Adjusted Utilitarian Belichickian Value...is a very intriguing Aspect, indeed.
***
Honestly, it's a fascinating subject that you breach, one I've seen mentioned before, by a few others, probably including yourself: Truly accurate assessment of any given Prospect AND any given Draft Pick ~ these being two distinct entities ~ must draw in not only the various and sundry considerations affecting the Book Values of those two, but the ever-roiling Market Value of each Slot in each given year ~ which undergo great change, indeed, from year to year ~ and of course the Relative Value of each TO each of 32 teams, these things ALSO being constantly in flux!!