- Joined
- Feb 8, 2005
- Messages
- 43,674
- Reaction score
- 24,270
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Bryant was not a shocker to me,A guy that was not good enough to try and keep on the roster of the friggin Lions keeps me aware of how lousy he really is.
I guess we have to see Mr. Cassel for awhile longer on the sidelines, but I am still holding out hope on a Veteran QB to be signed soemhow down the road.
BTW, I hope that NEM hasn't seen the roster... He'll be apoplectic that Hobbs is the #1 (good call there Signbabybrady)
Yep, it's a weird, unbalanced roster. Reading deep into the tea leaves, some wild speculation on what it could all mean...
- Welker and Aiken aren't ready for week 1?
- Pats were already in negotiations with Willie Anderson before cuts announced?
- Pats were already in negotiations with Ty Law before cuts announced?
Regardless, it's hard to imagine that CJ Jones lasts the season on the 53.
BTW, a big congratulations to a terrific rookie class!
Thanks, sometimes it seems I am the only one who sees great things out of Hobbs.
What got me so high on Hobbs was the way he played 2 years ago with the cast on. He improved on a good rookie year while playing with the cast and really used his hands well using the cast as a weapon and breaking up a bunch of plays with it.
Than last year he gutted it out on a bad groin and IMO played really good except that last play which no one seems to be able to shake and it blinds them.
Thanks, sometimes it seems I am the only one who sees great things out of Hobbs.
What got me so high on Hobbs was the way he played 2 years ago with the cast on. He improved on a good rookie year while playing with the cast and really used his hands well using the cast as a weapon and breaking up a bunch of plays with it.
Than last year he gutted it out on a bad groin and IMO played really good except that last play which no one seems to be able to shake and it blinds them.
When did Patsinsider say that?? a link or...just one of those remarks...??????? I didn't think so..maybe the porno Patsinsider spoke of
you are forgetting Ventrone, that makes 6.
I don't get it, is this a re-building year? They has to be more changes coming down the pike.
I count 13 new players on the active roster, similar to past years with 20-25% annual turnover.
Wilhite, Wheatley, Ventrone, Slater, Lewis Sanders, O’Connell, Mayo, Lynch, Jordan, CJ Jones, Guyton, Crable, Aiken
What don't you get? Most people believe there are more changes.
1) Faulk will be back after the KC game
2) Neal will be eligible to return after the Denver game
3) I've heard differing reports on Ross. I've heard Reserve/ NFI and I've heard Reserve/PUP. If its NFI, I believe he can come back as soon as he passes a physical. If its PUP, its after the Denver game.
4) The Pats haven't started a season under Belichick with fewer than 4 OTs. I don't see this one being one either. I also don't see them carrying 3 C/Gs behind Koppen going into game one against KC. I, like others, are hoping for Willie Anderson.
5) CB seems to be a weak area. I wouldn't be surprised to see them add one and cut CJ Jones. I think going with 6 WRs is alot, but 8 is nearly unheard of.
5) CB seems to be a weak area. I wouldn't be surprised to see them add one and cut CJ Jones. I think going with 6 WRs is alot, but 8 is nearly unheard of.
What don't you get? Most people believe there are more changes.
1) Faulk will be back after the KC game
2) Neal will be eligible to return after the Denver game
3) I've heard differing reports on Ross. I've heard Reserve/ NFI and I've heard Reserve/PUP. If its NFI, I believe he can come back as soon as he passes a physical. If its PUP, its after the Denver game.
4) The Pats haven't started a season under Belichick with fewer than 4 OTs. I don't see this one being one either. I also don't see them carrying 3 C/Gs behind Koppen going into game one against KC. I, like others, are hoping for Willie Anderson.
5) CB seems to be a weak area. I wouldn't be surprised to see them add one and cut CJ Jones. I think going with 6 WRs is alot, but 8 is nearly unheard of.
You see a Manning as a fit in NE? Too much MSG again!This ("final" 53) is always one of the most exciting threads of the year for me.
I'm surprised no one has mentioned Ricky Manning Jr. as a likely fill-in for the thin secondary! Or has he already signed elsewhere? Anyway, I've made no secret that I would like to see Law back.