Re: Patriots make cuts
Yes, change is good but 8 O Linemen? it is not like they have played like gang busters. 8 is the typical amount dressed for a game, not much of margin for error. The backup QB sucks, backup LBs are questionable, secondary is interesting, Merriweather must be healthy and slotted in to play in nickle situations.
Year in and year out you slam the Pats coaching staff claiming it sucks and that the team is horrible. Year in and year out, you are proven wrong. Weren't you one of the ones who was slamming the Pats draft?
This isn't the 1st time they've gone with 8 O-linemen. They started off 2005 with only 8 and it wasn't until late in the season when they signed Ross Tucker that they had a 9th. They also spent a good portion of 2006 with only 8 on the roster with Mruczkowski going on and off the roster.
The Pats back-up QB is Cassel, who is no worse than Rohan Davey was.
The back-up LBers clearly proved to BB that they were better than a veteran in Hobson. And, as others have said, Seau's locker is set-up so there is a good chance he'll be back. And that improves the LB depth even more.
Why MUST Meriweather be slotted to play in Nickel situations? What's to say that its not Lynch, J. Sanders, or L. Sanders?
Thank you for posting the list of cut and potential matches in the other thread, that was useful and I appreciate it.
Call me crazy but I would feel better if they signed Harrington, Anderson, Law, Colvin and Seau. But too many signings makes it hard to extend Wilfork, which is also a priority.
How many veteran FAs made the team? Aiken, Sanders, Jordan, Lynch.. I guess the batted about 50/50 which will get you into the hall of fame.
Why would you feel good about Harrington? I wouldn't. And I am pretty sure that Colvin was cut by the Texans because he's wasn't capable of playing up to the level he has played before.
I'd love to see the Pats bring in all three. They could do it also. And still have money left to give Wilfork an extension, though one doesn't need to be done before the spring.