Fencer
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 14,293
- Reaction score
- 3,986
Nice logical proofs, but my experience tells me that someone who treats women like garbage and calls them demeaning names, aggressively hits on the wives of his fans, is accused of rape in in another incident, and displayed boorish behavior on the night in question, is more likely to commit sexual assault than someone who hasn't been on record as doing those things. And how exactly does everyone get away with saying "he is not more likely, blah, blah, blah." I take it none of you have taken courses in criminal profiling or domestic violence. BR's characteristics are basic red flags of someone is more likely to be violent and abusive. Please don't confuse what it is admissible in a courtroom versus what is common sense outside the courtroom.
Or to put it another way, there are a few kinds of sexual assault charges:
- Totally true, give or take the small details that people always misremember (the most common kind by far)
- Largely true, in that the guy acted very badly, but the woman also overreacted some in understandable fright
- False -- she was trying to get back at him for lesser bad behavior, or had some other motive, or she's just nuts