- Joined
- Feb 10, 2005
- Messages
- 33,095
- Reaction score
- 22,715
I think you all are missing the point of SteelerSteve and my comments. I think I can speak for both of us when I say that our point is that we'd rather have a QB like Big Ben behind OUR underperforming O-line. I don't think anyone would argue that Ben is a better QB than Brady, but given the situation with the Pittsburgh O-line right now, I'd rather have a QB like Ben who can scramble, avoid tackles, and still make plays, then a less-mobile passer such as Brady or Manning. Any other QB in the league (Brady included) would have absorbed significantly more sacks when faced with the kind of pressure ben has been getting this season. Does that make more sense?
Yes, that does make sense. Ben is a horse to take down.
Brady senses the rush and moves well in the pocket but I admit I'd hate to see him take hit after vicious hit from a bad OL.
Last edited: