AtomicDawg
Patriot of the Week
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2011
- Messages
- 13,199
- Reaction score
- 37,466
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yes, fair point. I suppose it all comes down to your personal opinion on whether or not they end up keeping 4 or 5 WRs.I don't think you will see him if he is on the roster. Where are his reps?
We are a 2 TE offense. I believe we will be 2 TE on 3rd down as well, except maybe 3rd an very long.
Edelman and Hogan are 1 and 2, and Amendola will get some snaps, but I don't see the role for a 4th WR, much less a 5th.
We could seriously have games with only 3 active WRs, which has happened in the past, btw.
Does it concern anyone that hogan is our number 2 wide receiver while in buffalo he wasn't even good enough to crack the top 4? Or is buffalo just awful at evaluating talent ?
Hogan was 3 there and yes it was a bad evaluation to play Robert woods ahead of him.Does it concern anyone that hogan is our number 2 wide receiver while in buffalo he wasn't even good enough to crack the top 4? Or is buffalo just awful at evaluating talent ?
Does it concern anyone that hogan is our number 2 wide receiver while in buffalo he wasn't even good enough to crack the top 4? Or is buffalo just awful at evaluating talent ?
I predict BB will trade a surplus OL for a tall CB
I predict BB will trade a surplus OL for a tall CB