- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
but the gist of it was legit.
No, it wasn't.
Examples:
Constructive criticism - "Player A had an off game. He needs to work on his break, because the opponents were beating him there."
Not constructive criticism - "
that end of 1st half was a disgrace. and 30 sec left wasting 2 time outs and not even try to go for fg? that was another disgrace.
losing to jets make this loss 100 times worse."
Who doesn't try to score with 2 minutes left and 2 timeouts?
Teams having one issue or another. In this case, a team that was without a starting tackle, and had a replacement who'd been with the team for about 2 weeks, was getting his first in game snaps for the squad, and was not holding up well enough to run a 2 minute drill. If the Patriots had tried to score and Brady had gotten injured in the process, people here would be grabbing for the pitchforks about that. And, given the Patriots overall situation (bye in playoffs, easy chance to grab the 1 seed still available), THAT would be the correct time to rage.
I don't think that's ever been done before (Much like defering in OT).
Yes, it's happened before. We've seen this same Patriots team do it before.
It's within reason to criticize the coach's decision on playing it safe rather than blindly following along like everything's hunky dory.
I'm plenty willing to criticize the team, as my history proves. In this case, your criticism is not well thought out, and your post defending it is almost completely without thought.