Brady6
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2013
- Messages
- 15,641
- Reaction score
- 5,580
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Hes a good special team player and such but hes a roster spot they should try to be upgrading
BB seems to try and take care of players that have played hard for him! Maybe this was his way of taking care of Devey!
Read Reiss' report today and he said that Chandler looks like he will soon be ready to go again.Possible. Another possibility is Chandler's knee is worse than we know and bill is preparing to move on without him. Hopefully it's possibility number one.
I dunno, but the fact that he was released so early is a sign of an issue that Belichick isn't losing sleep over.
I think one of the few cases where he might wish he "could have that back" was when he tried to sneak Lee Smith and Will Yeatman onto the PS, and then they both got claimed off waivers.
I think Bill thought Gronk, Chandler and one of Derby, Bequette or Fred Davis would make it, but unfortuantely none of the three JAGs panned out.
As much as I know we need G help, I would hate to see Hooman go. He does so many of the little things and grunt work that make up a championship team. But it's a business so I would understand.Why is this a mystery? JB is hurt, Chandler is not 100%. You need bodies to take snaps in camp and in Pre season games. You want to keep Gronk fresh and minimize his exposure. Plus as mentioned if they are thinking about a Mathis move, cutting Hooman would free up 1.4
Agreed. I also think Chandler is a bit of Gronk insurance too.Hooman--you're forgetting Hooman.
I suspect that Belichick brought in Chandler to knock Hooman down to his (rightful) TE3 spot, and/or primarily blocking duty. The addition of Chandler allows us to have an improved receiving option at the position, while also proving scheme mismatches and injury insurance.
While Hooman is good enough to stick around as a blocking TE, he shouldn't have been our TE2.
I went by what Miguel has written on Patscap.com. $300K of his roster bonus is already payed. But it seems like we would save $1M towards someone like Mathis if we release Hooman for it. Just a straight up release would only save us $585K because someone else will have to take his roster spot.You are not accounting for his $400K roster bonus, incentives, and other factors of his salary. His cap hit is $1.5 and change of that only $180K is guaranteed for his prorated signing bonus.
Ehh, I disagree. There was no way he was getting passed waivers. Point being that the first team that could claim him, did claim him.
I think Bill thought Gronk, Chandler and one of Derby, Bequette or Fred Davis would make it, but unfortuantely none of the three JAGs panned out.