upstater1
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 26,596
- Reaction score
- 16,841
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yeah but we lost the only one that matters, RC ..... last years!RayClay said:As opposed to? Obviously I'd take a shot at these guys if they're available for low risk, but we've won 3 of the last 5 Super Bowls BMU.
Spoken like a man who himself has suffered the same fate .........upstater1 said:I can sympathize with Bob. The falling branches and hysteria of people in the Buffalo-Ft. Erie area can make one delirious.
Bobs My Uncle said:I approached this as a "take it or leave" proposal believing that no way the Pats could steal Moss for just a 1st. So, make it two firsts by tossing in the other 1st in return for Porter as well. The Raiders could then say they got two firsts for Moss because "no team was giving us anything for Porter......"
As for needing another WR. We'll need another WR as soon as Troy hangs em up. Unless you think Caldwell or Gabriel or No Action Jackson can replace Troy. I don't see Troy's replacement in any of these 3 guys.
Bobs My Uncle said:Yeah but we lost the only one that matters, RC ..... last years!
I want another 3 or more SB titles starting this year. I'm already sick and tired of not winning SB's
Use the entire draft next year to find these guys if need be. With Moss and Porter added, along with the stability and youth at QB, OL, RB, and TE, the Pats can pass on drafting offense for a year.RayClay said:We need young Linebackers, cornerback and maybe safeties more, IMO.
I don't share the same belief as you do that Moss is a cancer like TO. Porter might be that kind of person but I sure as heck don't know. In either case, the presumption I made is that the Pats brass aren't worried about the addition of these two.RayClay said:I'd rather have 3 or 4 good receivers than 1 primadonna. How's the overlook the character thing working out with T.O.? I think he's a bit of a distraction.
The Raiders need draft picks now more than anything. Well losses too is good for them.DCPatsFan said:My question is: Why would the Raiders trade Moss? If anything, they need him now more than ever, especially with Porter not playing and Gabriel dealt to the Pats. It's Porter that the Raiders desperately want to deal
DCPatsFan said:My question is: Why would the Raiders trade Moss? If anything, they need him now more than ever, especially with Porter not playing and Gabriel dealt to the Pats. It's Porter that the Raiders desperately want to deal
PaulNEPats said:By the time the Raiders are a contender (years from now), Moss will be out of his prime.
Bobs My Uncle said:Like to stay and chat gang but I'm off to see Eric Andersen perform tonight.
RayClay said:We need young Linebackers, cornerback and maybe safeties more, IMO.
Yeah, Moss and Porter are the keys woth league domination! Look what they've done for the Raiders since they've been there.Bobs My Uncle said:I
The Pats should trade for both Moss and Porter.
...offer up both 1st's for the two of them and then settle in for a few years of league domination.
How do you guys think this stuff up? This is hilarious! Tell me again how Moss is a steal for "just a first." Man, you crack me up.Bobs My Uncle said:I approached this as a "take it or leave" proposal believing that no way the Pats could steal Moss for just a 1st. So, make it two firsts by tossing in the other 1st in return for Porter as well. The Raiders could then say they got two firsts for Moss because "no team was giving us anything for Porter......"
He's a long time folk singer/writer extraordinaire, in the Dylan vein.captain stone said:Who's Eric Andersen?
And you crack me up for believing otherwise.brady2brown said:Tell me again how Moss is a steal for "just a first." Man, you crack me up.