Wilfork#75
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2010
- Messages
- 2,348
- Reaction score
- 859
Re: Matt Williamson: The Pats will be "really involved" in trying to get Mario Willi
I wasn't aware that your could only amortize a signing bonus over 5 years. Even still, that would only bump the first 5 years up $1.2 mil per season which is minimal. As for the length, Mayo got a 5 year extension on top of his 2 remaining years, so it essentially a 7 year deal, although the first 2 years are still part of his rookie deal. Brady signed his 5 year deal at the age of 33, Wilfork 29 and Mankins 29. Mario Williams just turned 27 years old, so a 7 year deal makes sense. And it generally costs more to sign new players than retain your old ones. I think at this stage Brady and Wilfork care more about winning that who makes more money, so I don't see them having too much of an issue if someone has a bigger signing bonus. The giant roster bonus at the end of the current contract was more of a throw away line because you can never underestimate a players ego. I'm not cap expert and I do not claim to be. I'm just trying to look deeper at how something like this could come together, and any constructive input you could add would be appreciated.
We don't do 7 year deals. Even for the QB. Mankins got 6, Wilfork got 5. You can only amortize signing bonus for 5. And even if we use option bonus if it's guaranteed it starts amortizing immediately as Manning's did even before it was paid. If his deal were to average $14M he isn't going to allow for much backloading that only insures he gets cut before the final season. And you can't do what Chicago did with Peppers because there is no uncapped season to absorb $20M in cap hit off the top. And even with that his cap hit this season is $12M and will rise for the remainder of the deal. He's going to want at least half of his deal guaranteed, that's the going rate and at his rate that's going to be $40M+. If he takes less in average, he will want more guaranteed. Part of that will be signing bonus, and it's hard to top $20M here because you asked Brady and others to remain at or below that line.
They can absolutely fit Mario under the cap if they choose to. Same way the JETS do it. The question will remain at what cost, and not just in contract but in roster cuts elsewhere and in quality depth and morgaging the future. Next year and the year after we will have the young TE's to deal with just for openers and they will likely be looking for deals in the $7-8M per range. Then there will be the OT's as well as Chung and Spikes. Which one or more of them do you not want to retain or replace so we can have a $12-14M DE on the roster? The cap will go up double digits in 2014, but so will contract demands for existing and future players. There is more than one way a team can come up just a little short of winning it all.
I wasn't aware that your could only amortize a signing bonus over 5 years. Even still, that would only bump the first 5 years up $1.2 mil per season which is minimal. As for the length, Mayo got a 5 year extension on top of his 2 remaining years, so it essentially a 7 year deal, although the first 2 years are still part of his rookie deal. Brady signed his 5 year deal at the age of 33, Wilfork 29 and Mankins 29. Mario Williams just turned 27 years old, so a 7 year deal makes sense. And it generally costs more to sign new players than retain your old ones. I think at this stage Brady and Wilfork care more about winning that who makes more money, so I don't see them having too much of an issue if someone has a bigger signing bonus. The giant roster bonus at the end of the current contract was more of a throw away line because you can never underestimate a players ego. I'm not cap expert and I do not claim to be. I'm just trying to look deeper at how something like this could come together, and any constructive input you could add would be appreciated.