upstater1
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2005
- Messages
- 26,620
- Reaction score
- 16,893
No, that's not what he's saying.
What he's actually saying is this: the only way the Pats' waiver claim would hold is if no one else put in a claim. If they do that, they owe Moss the rest of his salary for 2010.
Since Moss has never been waived before, Minnesota is currently on the hook for the rest of his 2010 salary unless someone claims him off waivers.
Therefore, why should the Pats shell out $3M when they can get him for vet minimum, and soak Minnesota for the difference?
He says economic concerns prevent them from claiming him. $3 million is not much at all in the scheme of things. Randy could earn a bigger multi-year deal elsewhere.
$2.5 million risk? That's it?
Last edited: