cblesz
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2006
- Messages
- 1,365
- Reaction score
- 0
Maybe we have already covered this 1,000 times. But, does anyone here remember the Miami game? We were shut out. Miami was not an offensive juggernaut that day, but their defense held us to no points and made our offensive line look foolish.
My concern heading into this game is specifically, Matt Light and his ability to control "steroid boy". In the Miami game, Jason Taylor as always made him look foolish. He was a turnstile and Miami was in our backfield all day. I am sure we will give Light help by putting Graham over there, but in doing so, this takes an offesive option away. I am hoping for several different variations of the screen pass. In my opinion, controlling Merriman is the key to the game. Look, we all know San Diego is going to put points on the board. We simply have to match their production. If we can control Merriman and keep him out of Brady's face, we should be able to match points with San Diego. Then, it is a matter of execution late in the game. If that is the case, my money goes on Brady rather than Rivers.
My concern heading into this game is specifically, Matt Light and his ability to control "steroid boy". In the Miami game, Jason Taylor as always made him look foolish. He was a turnstile and Miami was in our backfield all day. I am sure we will give Light help by putting Graham over there, but in doing so, this takes an offesive option away. I am hoping for several different variations of the screen pass. In my opinion, controlling Merriman is the key to the game. Look, we all know San Diego is going to put points on the board. We simply have to match their production. If we can control Merriman and keep him out of Brady's face, we should be able to match points with San Diego. Then, it is a matter of execution late in the game. If that is the case, my money goes on Brady rather than Rivers.