jcdavey
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2007
- Messages
- 4,670
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
True, but I couldn't really get anything out of Kaczur's "I don't know what you're talking about, bro" comment.
lmao @ 'hero'
dude wore a wire after getting busted for drugs , oh yeah he's a hero, especially to the boston crowd, they respect people who wear wires
I will & still be unimpressed with this "socially conscious" dealer.Yes, let's take the word of a lawyer representing somone who is the seller of drugs.
Like the media, your judgment is based on Favre is Favre and Kaczur is not.
Favre is good because he is Favre. He was in way deeper, and was in trouble with alcohol as well. If Goodell was commissioner back then, Farve would have been out of the NFL ten years ago.
Neither player is admriable, but your double standard is disgusting.
So, refresh my memory. Was Favre busted for purchasing scripts illegally on the streets and did he turn DEA informant? I don't recall?
Sometimes the homerism displayed here is nauseating. Not every Patriot is a hero. Not every coaching move is a good one. Not every signing works out. Try, just try, to look at things objectively sometimes....seriously. It does not make you less of a fan. Honest.
I somehow seem to miss what is so bad about taking down the people actually distributing controlled substances. I mean, I know it's a macho gang/mob mentality to not tell on somebody, but I can't really see how that mindset benefits society.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not at all happy that the guy was a drug user. I’m OK with the idea that he might be replaced for it.
I just don’t get the “bad snitcher” angle. He's no hero for it, but it's not a bad thing either. Buying and using the drugs was the bad thing.
It takes two to tango. He was involved in the illegal activity, too. Now, to save his own neck, he's suddenly put someone away for something that he took part in. Anyway, my mentality (and I only speak for me here) is different with consensual crimes (like drugs) versus nonconsensual crimes.I somehow seem to miss what is so bad about taking down the people actually distributing controlled substances. I mean, I know it's a macho gang/mob mentality to not tell on somebody, but I can't really see how that mindset benefits society.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not at all happy that the guy was a drug user. I’m OK with the idea that he might be replaced for it.
I just don’t get the “bad snitcher” angle. He's no hero for it, but it's not a bad thing either. Buying and using the drugs was the bad thing.
It takes two to tango. He was involved in the illegal activity, too. Now, to save his own neck, he's suddenly put someone away for something that he took part in. Anyway, my mentality (and I only speak for me here) is different with consensual crimes (like drugs) versus nonconsensual crimes.
You speak for me, too.
There is indeed a difference, which we have known since high school - or should have known - between violent, victim-producing crimes and non-violent, self-victimizing offenses. If you are caught partaking in the latter, you don't squeal on your partners if it's your fault that you were caught.
Nickie the Snitch is a weakling, a coward and a rat. I hope he is released and then plays for the NJ R-a-t-s.
If you had "the goods" in the first place, and did something like that, then you'd be a coward. And there ain't nothing you can do about that.Personally, if I'm caught with the goods and face prison time and they offer me a deal of no time if I turn you (my dealer)in, you're going down too brother. And there's not a damn thing you can do about it either. Just say bye, bye to the wifie and family as you go off to the big house!
Who gives a rats ass about a dealer anyway?
I will also encourage all of our younger members by saying that reporting criminal activity is something you should be proud of. So never hesitate to drop a dime on people engaging in illegal activities.
The facts came from an 8-page filing by the DA that accompanied the indictment. You're right that we haven't gotten both sides of the story, but there are facts from a source of record.Once again, the only one talking is a drug dealers lawyer.
Yet the Globe saw fit to run a front page story that no one else in the media seems to care about right now. Some of you want to lable Nick as a rat, a drug addict, and want him cut base on a drug dealers lawyer's story.
Yes, I am a homer but fact are facts. I'd like to wait for all of the facts to come out from someone other than a drug dealers lawyer, before I come to any conclusions.
If you had "the goods" in the first place, and did something like that, then you'd be a coward. And there ain't nothing you can do about that.