Gostkowski for 3
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Dec 15, 2010
- Messages
- 194
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.And how many balls did the jets drop?
And how many wide open receivers were missed?
The jets easily could have done much better. But then, they were missing a receiver and they have one of the very worst offenses in the NFL.
They look good. True test is against ATL. But this secondary is better than last year IMO
That was a football game tonight, alright...what I take from it is, they found a way to win. The rest is purely farcical to analyze...3 1/2 days rest and major injuries..I'm surprised they pulled this one out. You take it and forget about it.
I worry about the chemistry with the rooks with Brady...Thompkins looks like a square peg. Dobson had drops, but got open and ran the right routes for the most part. I think Amendola comes back, Edelman plays, with Dobson flanked and Gronk. Thomkins looks like he's a fallen meteorite
I didnt find much confidence in our pass coverage. There were several times when our secondary would have burned if not for the rookie at QB. Often times it just seems to easy to pass on us. Most of the problems are on the inside. I have seen Talib get beat quite a few times but otherwise the corners have been good.
I didnt find much confidence in our pass coverage. There were several times when our secondary would have burned if not for the rookie at QB. Often times it just seems to easy to pass on us. Most of the problems are on the inside. I have seen Talib get beat quite a few times but otherwise the corners have been good.
Yep. One play to look at was the pass breakup by Dennard that resulted in the 2nd INT iirc. The problem with it was that Dennard was beaten pretty badly. Only reason for the INT was that Geno underthrew the ball. If that ball was on target, it would have been a long completion instead of an INT.
I just refuse to get excited about a Patriots secondary until I see consistency. They played decently enough against the Bills and Jets, both playing rookies (I believe EJ Manuel is). It really proves nothing, unless they played shut down and always in the right place. Well the Pats secondary hasn't been shut down, because they still get beat frequently and often times luck goes our way.
The secondary basically hasn't changed at all personnel wise, and I need to see proof that they are actually improved. Like against an offense with a legit QB? From what I saw, the secondary doesn't look much different at all. I've only noticed Arrington is bigger, and dare I say better than in the past.
When they play ATL, CINN and NO we will be able to see if improvement is there.