- Joined
- Mar 13, 2005
- Messages
- 20,536
- Reaction score
- 1
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Hardy's your binky - got it. He's second round at best for me.
Hardy's your binky - got it. He's second round at best for me.
Binkies are where you find them, I'll revisit my assessment as we move closer to the draft.Not my binky; my binky would be Spiller who I've loved for the past 3 years. I just believe Hardy is the most talented OLB prospect in the draft. I think he has all the traits necessary to be an elite OLB in our defense. OLB is, in my eyes, our biggest need, and Hardy's injuries do not concern me as much as they concern you. He seemed healed from his foot problems early this year, and a broken wrist is not that big of an injury to come back from. If he had torn an knee ligament like Merriman did, I would agree. But he didn't.
Obviously we disagree on where he should go based on a variety of factors. You've had your binkies with Barwin and Gocong, who you thought higher of than others like myself did. Thought Barwin was a 3rd rounder at best.
Not my binky; my binky would be Spiller who I've loved for the past 3 years. I just believe Hardy is the most talented OLB prospect in the draft. I think he has all the traits necessary to be an elite OLB in our defense. OLB is, in my eyes, our biggest need, and Hardy's injuries do not concern me as much as they concern you. He seemed healed from his foot problems early this year, and a broken wrist is not that big of an injury to come back from. If he had torn an knee ligament like Merriman did, I would agree. But he didn't.
Obviously we disagree on where he should go based on a variety of factors. You've had your binkies with Barwin and Gocong, who you thought higher of than others like myself did. Thought Barwin was a 3rd rounder at best.
Yessir couldn't agree with you more. You need to have game-changers on both sides of the ball. We have that in Brady, Moss, Welker, etc. on the offensive side, but we are lacking on defense at the LB position, especially OLB. It would be nice to see us trade up every once in a while to add a guy that can come in and have an immediate impact, rather than always moving back and having good but not great guys come in.
The perfect example is when we had the San Fran pick in 2008. We wound up selecting Mayo at 10. He came in and had an instant impact, won DROY, and was a playmaker at the ILB position where we definitely needed to get younger.
Right now, IMO, we need some young talent at the OLB position. It's extremely important in today's NFL to have a great pass rusher to get pressure on the QB. A lot of those elite pass rushers go in the first 15 to 20 picks. I say this year it's time we go get the elite talent and sacrifice a little value.
Did you go back to the archives and read my posts from 2002-present?
Couldn't agree more. Here's the problem with our opinions: others believe we sound like the typical new, unknowledgable fan when we say oh we need to get a Julius Peppers, oh we need to get a Randy Moss, we need to get a Demarcus Ware. And, we're not even saying that much. I would do anything for a Willie McGinest in his prime right now. I've been saying it for a while because I watched our linebackers getting older and didn't see any young successors coming in. Unless you count Ryan Claridge and Monty Beisel .
Are solid blue collar players the glue that holds a great team together for many years because you can keep them for low costs? Absolutely. But, you still need those playmakers on both sides of the ball. In our title years we had Richard Seymour, Willie, Vrabel, Bruschi, Rodney, Ty Law, Phifer, Tyrone Poole, and the list goes on and on. What playmakers do we have on defense right now? Mayo is close and will improve but he's not even really there yet. Meriweather is a playmaker. Bodden to an extent. Butler I think will be. That's pretty much it unfortunately. "Big time players make big time plays in big time games." Who stuffed Edge on the goal line? Who pressured Warner into his int? Who made that pick and returned it for a touchdown?.....All playmakers. We will not have anywhere close to an elite defense again until we acquire some playmakers, especially on the edge.
Last year the Pats could've drafted Chung and Vollmer later than when they were selected. They could've traded back and gotten better 'value' for them both, but they didn't because they had guys targeted and didn't want to risk the chance on losing out on them to someone else.
Lol, no I didn't go back and look at any of your posts, but I definitely share the same views as you. It's not like we're saying we need to be the Yankees with All Stars at every position. You absolutely need good blue collar guys for low salaries to be successful in the NFL on offense, defense, and special teams.
But to be a great team, you also need playmakers. Guys who can step onto the field and make plays that change the game. As you said, we had those guys in Seymour, Law, Samuel, Rodney, etc. As we rebuild this defense, we are lacking guys of that caliber. I'd consider Wilfork, Mayo, and potentially Meriweather and Butler the only playmakers we currently have. To add those types of talents, you often have to move up into the top 15 or top 20. I'd like to see us move up sometimes rather than just moving back looking for good "value" all the time. The best draft pick of the last 4 years, IMO, has been Mayo. Look at where we got him. It's not a coincidence.
I like this newbie.
When we drafted Volmer ppl said it was a reach, when we drafted Mankins ppl said it was a reach. If you value someone you go after him. You don't draft a guy 10th if he's the 50th best player, but taking him with the 32nd pick isn't that huge of a stretch.
This is especially the case with the Pats as we like to draft guys that will fit our system and fill a specific role.
I'm so right there with you. I LOVED the Wilfork pick, but as soon as we made it I was screaming at my tv for us to trade up with the 32nd pick to grab SJax, we stayed pat and took Watson instead.
Exactly how I feel. If you have a guy you like, you go after him.
S-Jax would look great in a Pats jersey. I would've loved to see us do that, especially since we don't even use Watson that much.
I still don't really get why we draft tight ends high, since we don't use them at all in the passing game. I know we like them to be versatile and block well, but man, you can get that in the mid rounds.