Yet Brady's three Super Bowls, which are 8, 10, and 11 years in the past respectively, have no bearing on how he played this year, or last year, or the year before, etc.
All you've done in further illustrated my point. The only way you, as a fan base, can continue to pump up Brady as a clutch playoff QB is to point to results that at this point are near ancient.
No one in this thread is talking about Brady's performance in 2001, 2002, or 2004. So why bother referencing it?
But neither is Brady since 2005.
First of all, you may want to check your facts because "2005" is a pretty sorry starting point.
The 2006 season featured a group of WRs that were better meant for tennis than they were for NFL football, and yet Brady led them to the AFCCG (where they most likely would have beaten Chicago in the SB). It certainly wasn't his fault that the defense blew the biggest lead in conference championship history.
The 2007 season was the 18-1 year, so I'm really not too sure what you could possibly say about that. Brady led his team to what should have been the SB winning TD with about 2:30 remaining. I suppose we should blame the freak helmet catch on Brady too?
2008 he went down in the first quarter of the first game and never returned. I personally don't hold him responsible for a torn ACL/MCL.
2009 Welker got hurt, which severely limited the offense. Baltimore came in tough and wanted it more. Nuff' said.
2010 was an insane year of overachieving that saw the 2nd youngest defense (and a team with 1/3 of its players UDFAs) gain the #1 seed but lose to the Jets. Brady threw 2 TDs and had 1 INT. I'm not really sure what this means?
2011 was another #1 seed, a AFCCG win, and a SB appearance. Manning catch part 2 was once again not his fault. At one point he was 20/24 with 2 TD's, and set a SB record for 17 consecutive completions.
2012 was an AFCCG appearance and a loss. While Brady himself did not have a good game, one thing to remember is that they were up 13-7 driving on Baltimore's 25 with less than 5 minutes remaining to the last quarter. It wasn't exactly a shelling of epic proportions. The defense was the side of the ball that couldn't keep a 14-13 game in the 4th quarter close, and Ridley's fumble and a tipped pass at the LOS didn't help matters either. All in all, they did go 7/15 on 3rd downs and enter the BAL 35 on eight separate occasions. It's not like they didn't move the ball. They just sucked in the red zone.
I am not seeing "2005" as a weak point that started anything. I am seeing a "TEAM" that did not win in it's 2 SB appearances, although they certainly should have at least split one as both were within 4 points, as were ALL of the 5 SB totals.
Your mistake is made by comparing Brady and his success to that of a "team" who has significant defensive flaws, and gave up several late game TD's in very important moments to lose the bigger playoff games.